Skip to main content

Bush and Rubio Backers Start Donating to Hillary Clinton




Hillary Clinton is raising a lot of money from Wall Street--a lot more than Donald Trump. Why is that a bad thing?

Clinton received $344,000 from the financial services sector in March alone, according to the WSJ's analysis of fundraising data from the Center for ResponsivePolitics. In total, the Democratic presidential candidate has raised $4.2 million from Wall Street.

More than half of her donations in March were from Wall Street, which was up from 32 percent last year and 33 percent in January through February. Clinton's campaign has said it raised a total of $213 million through April.

Donald Trump, now the presumptive GOP nominee, hasn't received more than 1 percent of donations coming from Wall Street in any month through March. The billionaire businessman has raised $49 million through March, $36 million of which came from his own personal funds.

The analysis revealed that some Wall Street donors who donated to GOP candidates like Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush are now contributing to Clinton's bid.

People on Wall Street do not like to throw their money away--that should be a given at this point. And they want to back Hillary because they support her policies. Finally, we have a Democrat who can play this game and win. Aren't we supposed to be happy with that?

They do not want anything to do with Donald Trump. Sorta makes them sane, doesn't it?

Many liberals would prefer her to cut ties with Wall Street and get behind the idea that the financial industry should be regulated and controlled. There's an all or nothing aspect to this--they immediately go to unsubstantiated claims of corruption and influence. Nobody can produce a single instance where her vote or her support was bought off, but they say it because they can get away with it. These are the Clintons after all, and we live under the Clinton Rules. Anything that a Republican can get away with makes the Clintons into criminals if they so much as sniff at it themselves.

Well, what industry doesn't contribute to politicians and expect access and favors? Are we going to ban lobbying and hope that the money disappears from the political process? And shouldn't we be impressed that we have a Democrat running for President who knows how to talk to these people and get their backing in key issues? How is that any more evil than dealing with the defense industry, the nuclear power industry, or the gun lobby? I don't recall Bernie Sanders having a stellar record on that front.

Well, you're more likely to get that if she does get elected. Her regulatory people are going to be a lot better than anyone Donald Trump could choose and they still want to give her money. That's a pretty amazing commentary on the state of the Republican Party at this point. 












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Democrats Are Trying to Save America

Never forget that Trump is a bum. A cheating, lying, stealing bum. He's the kind of bum that gives actual bums (who are usually down on their luck and doing the best they can) a bad name. He's a bum on purpose, you see, and that's the kind of bum that the American people want to see thrown out of office. He's never going to be presidential because he's just a goddamned bum, you see.

But, sometimes, I think the media is worse:
As Washington braces for this week’s expected vote to impeach President Donald Trump, partisan battle lines hardened on Sunday, with Democrats defending impeachment even if Trump isn’t removed from office and Republicans denouncing the integrity of the constitutional process.The Democratic-controlled House planned to vote Wednesday on two articles of impeachment against the Republican president, and the decision whether to make Trump the third U.S. president in history to be impeached was expected to play out along party lines. There is some d…

Spoiler Alert

Tulsi Gabbard is going to work very, very hard to re-elect Trump:
Tulsi Gabbard has been slowly edging toward leaving the Democratic Party and, it now seems more likely than not, launching a spoiler candidacy to peel disaffected left-wing votes away from the Democrats. Her “present” vote on impeachment, followed by a disavowal of what she called the “zero-sum mind-set the two political parties have trapped America in,” sets the stage for Gabbard to play the role of 2020’s Jill Stein.Left-wing anti-anti-Trumpism played an important role in the bizarre 2016 outcome.Die-hard Bernie activists, fired up with anger at the release of DNC emails stolen by Russians that purportedly showed the party had rigged the primary, demonstrated against the party outside its convention hall and tried to drown out the speakers inside with boos. Stein attacked Hillary Clinton from the left, then audaciously staged a grift-y fundraising scheme supposedly to hold recounts in the states she had labored to flip…

Trump Will Burn it All to the Ground

It is difficult to see how the latest war in the Middle East will end. I don't have any answers, and, really, no one else does, either.

Here's what people should pay attention to--this happened just as evidence of Trump's orders to the Department of Defense landed on the front page. This happened after the major holidays and just as we are beginning the 2020 primary season in earnest on the Democratic side (the GOP has decided to prevent another Pat Buchanan moment, circa 1992, from happening).

Every life that is lost is because of Trump's decisions.

Every penny that this increases the price of gas is a tax on the poor and allows people who regularly have access to Trump to maximize their profits.

Every American traveling overseas is less safe.

Everyone who cares about peace will be shouted down and marginalized because that is the media's job.

Every attempt to hold Trump accountable will probably fail because the GOP is complicit in all of his crimes.

Everyone ch…