Skip to main content

This is Why You Don't Keep a Gun in the Barracks, Ever

In the ongoing non-debate about gun control that we are having in this country, I keep going back to the core reason why we can't have an honest debate.

People think gun control does not work. But, in point of fact, it certainly does.

This story is not really about guns, but it is about judgment and opportunity. It is about common sense. And if you start to think about something as basic as public safety, you have a chance to consider gun control from another angle.

Whatever happened in Alaska between these soldiers was a tragedy. I'm sure that Mr. Drake would certainly like to go back and not shoot his fellow soldier. But, at the crux of the Army's case against him is the charge of having a gun in the barracks, and an unregistered one at that.

As shocking as it is for some people, our soldiers are not allowed to have guns in their barracks when they are stateside. I'm sure that the NRA is apoplectic about this, but the fact remains--the Army isn't going to change its ways. It is not going to allow guns in the barracks. In some cases, weapons can be in the barracks, but they are still accounted for; ammunition is never to be loaded into a weapon unless that soldier is performing some sort of guard duty. And, under no circumstances, are you allowed to keep your loaded gun in the barracks when you're at your duty station. That's right--the United States Army practices the most stringent kind of gun control. Zero tolerance, no allowances, no do-overs.

If the people trained to handle weapons can't have guns with them in the place where they sleep, watch television, and live, then why should we be surprised when the Army prosecutes someone for breaking that rule? The Army has moved well beyond the gun control debate into the realm of common sense--if you let soldiers have guns, soldiers are going to shoot each other dead. Accidentally, on purpose, or drunk, they're going to shoot each other, and that's why they're not allowed to have their personally owned weapons on them. That's why they are searched and watched and forced to account for the weapons and the ammunition they use.

Someone has to figure out that if you let people have a bunch of guns, you're going to have people getting shot. If that's cool with you, then, by all means, flood the world with guns and hope you don't get blown away. While you're doing that, the people who run the Army are going to practice the kind of gun control that they wish they could practice in a lot of urban areas.


Popular posts from this blog

Democrats Are Trying to Save America

Never forget that Trump is a bum. A cheating, lying, stealing bum. He's the kind of bum that gives actual bums (who are usually down on their luck and doing the best they can) a bad name. He's a bum on purpose, you see, and that's the kind of bum that the American people want to see thrown out of office. He's never going to be presidential because he's just a goddamned bum, you see.

But, sometimes, I think the media is worse:
As Washington braces for this week’s expected vote to impeach President Donald Trump, partisan battle lines hardened on Sunday, with Democrats defending impeachment even if Trump isn’t removed from office and Republicans denouncing the integrity of the constitutional process.The Democratic-controlled House planned to vote Wednesday on two articles of impeachment against the Republican president, and the decision whether to make Trump the third U.S. president in history to be impeached was expected to play out along party lines. There is some d…

Spoiler Alert

Tulsi Gabbard is going to work very, very hard to re-elect Trump:
Tulsi Gabbard has been slowly edging toward leaving the Democratic Party and, it now seems more likely than not, launching a spoiler candidacy to peel disaffected left-wing votes away from the Democrats. Her “present” vote on impeachment, followed by a disavowal of what she called the “zero-sum mind-set the two political parties have trapped America in,” sets the stage for Gabbard to play the role of 2020’s Jill Stein.Left-wing anti-anti-Trumpism played an important role in the bizarre 2016 outcome.Die-hard Bernie activists, fired up with anger at the release of DNC emails stolen by Russians that purportedly showed the party had rigged the primary, demonstrated against the party outside its convention hall and tried to drown out the speakers inside with boos. Stein attacked Hillary Clinton from the left, then audaciously staged a grift-y fundraising scheme supposedly to hold recounts in the states she had labored to flip…

Trump Will Burn it All to the Ground

It is difficult to see how the latest war in the Middle East will end. I don't have any answers, and, really, no one else does, either.

Here's what people should pay attention to--this happened just as evidence of Trump's orders to the Department of Defense landed on the front page. This happened after the major holidays and just as we are beginning the 2020 primary season in earnest on the Democratic side (the GOP has decided to prevent another Pat Buchanan moment, circa 1992, from happening).

Every life that is lost is because of Trump's decisions.

Every penny that this increases the price of gas is a tax on the poor and allows people who regularly have access to Trump to maximize their profits.

Every American traveling overseas is less safe.

Everyone who cares about peace will be shouted down and marginalized because that is the media's job.

Every attempt to hold Trump accountable will probably fail because the GOP is complicit in all of his crimes.

Everyone ch…