An American Lion
Powered by Squarespace

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Rampage of the Innocents - My Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

Tags

 

Categories

An American Lion

The Monthly Archives

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system.

An American Lion

Talking Smack About Sports

The Things I Do

I’m a Mommy Blogger

The Admiral Hassenpfeffer

Rachel Ray’s Magnificent Ass

Ghost Ride The Whip

I Love My Guns More Than My Children

The Republican Party

Safe For Work Hotties

Money

BlogWithIntegrity.com _______________________

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Twingly BlogRank

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

Subscribe in Bloglines

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to netvibes

blogarama - the blog directory

TAMAZU: About Me Blogs

add page

Personal web site of Yulia Tymoshenko

http://www.wikio.com

http://www.wikio.com/

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Entries in Parenting (22)

    Sunday
    07Feb2010

    Will That Be Cash or Kwedit?

    Let me be one voice of reason here:

    A new payment option for anyone without a credit card or a debit card, no matter how young, has just become available. It’s initially offered by FooPets and Puzzle Pirates, online game companies that are business partners of Kwedit.com, a start-up based in Mountain View, Calif.

    Minors as well as adults can buy items in the games with a “Kwedit Promise,” which can be paid off later in a number of ways — with a credit or debit card, for example, or with cash sent in a mailer that Kwedit supplies.

    But here’s an entirely new payment option: A user can print out a barcode and head to a 7-Eleven store, which will accept cash, scan the code and notify Kwedit that payment has been made. In the next three months, a Kwedit logo will join those for credit cards and other payment methods on the doors of all 7-Elevens, a company spokesman says.

    As game purveyors, Kwedit’s current partners sell virtual goods whose marginal cost is virtually zero, so there’s no risk of real financial loss if the promise is not repaid. But by offering Kwedit’s service, the game publishers capitalize on the most frictionless form of sales: buy now, pay later.

    At FooPets, users “adopt” lifelike digitally animated pets and then buy virtual goods for them, including food, beds and chew toys. The site’s core demographic is 12- to 14-year-old girls, said Scott Sorochak, a co-founder of FooMojo, which operates the site. The company says that FooPets has one million active members and that it is signing up 20,000 to 25,000 new members daily.

    “Kwedit is the first payment system we’ve used that doesn’t require getting a parent involved,” Mr. Sorochak said.

    Now an eighth grader, on her own, can use a Kwedit Promise to buy a virtual 40-pound bag of Purina Puppy Chow. The chow exists only as a photograph of a Purina package, but FooPets instructs its users that the care and feeding of the digital pets they’ve adopted should be regarded as a serious matter. “Your FooPet is a real creature that lives online,” the company’s Web site says.

    In this day and age, I can’t think of any good that can come out of this. As soon as you give a minor the tool they need to escape scrutiny, they will use it. As soon as they figure out how to take money from a 13 year-old, then they’re going to take a lot of money from 13 year-olds. And, as soon as parents see this sort of thing for what it is, they’ll protest, and they’ll figure out how to get it banned. I don’t want to be bothered with this on the news; if it sounds like a bad idea up front, then the inevitable evening news story about this a month from now is really going to annoy me. And I don’t even watch the evening news anymore. I’ve outsmarted the news; I know what’s going to be on before they do.

    One of the few things parents can control is what their children buy online; if you take that away, look for all kinds of unethical things to happen. Yes, I do realize that there are definitely some upsides to this sort of thing, but the downsides? The downsides are embodied in the idea that a parent won’t know what their 13 year-old is buying. How do you get your money back if junior blows a few hundred bucks this way? Joe Sixpack, be prepared to see your kids spend all your grocery money on virtual scratching posts for a kitty that doesn’t exist.

    Isn’t that how we make money in this country now? By providing an expensive time-waster so that young people can spend all of their money on intangibles that don’t actually exist? And they wonder why we’re absolutely screwed as a society.

    As the man once said, we are amusing ourselves to death.

    Thursday
    28Jan2010

    Sure Sounds Like Busing to Me

    The Soiling of Old Glory, Stanley J. Forman

    I don’t know what your reaction is, but my reaction to this is one of dread because it sounds an awful lot like busing:

    In a battle mirrored in other districts across the U.S., parents here have been fighting for months over which public high school their kids will attend: one under construction in an affluent corner of the Plano Independent School District, or an older school several miles away in the city’s more diverse downtown.

    SUBURB1

    Last month, the district’s school board angered many parents when it created a Pac-Man-shaped zone that placed their children in the downtown school for grades nine and 10 instead of in the newer, closer campus.

    The downtown school has the highest proportion of poor students of all high schools in the district; many are Hispanic and African-American.

    “We want to go to our neighborhood school,” said Kelly McBrayer, a white, 48-year-old stay-at-home mother of three who lives near the site of the new high school.

    Mrs. McBrayer and other parents from her neighborhood held a silent protest at a recent school-board meeting. They wore black T-shirts with the shape of the new attendance zone in bright pink and the message “Pac-Man in your neighborhood soon?”

    Is this really a sign that we are going to have racial and class tensions from the 1970s all over again? Have we come far enough as a nation to avoid a replay of such a thing? 

    “It’s going to be harder and harder to find a community that’s all white,” said Matthew Hall, a doctoral student at Pennsylvania State University who studies diversity in the suburbs. “The tensions that are happening in places like Plano are going to play out across all communities eventually.”

    Other suburbs with quality schools are undergoing similar demographic changes to Plano, prompting many to revisit boundaries in an attempt to balance enrollment and integrate new students. The situation becomes especially fraught when states rank schools’ performance; these ratings influence both local housing prices and college admissions.

    Some residents of Fairfax County, Va., filed a lawsuit in the county’s circuit court in 2008 to reverse a school board’s decision that sent their children from several high-achieving but overcrowded schools to an underutilized, lower-achieving high school with a bigger proportion of minority students. The court ruled in favor of the board.

    The school district in Eden Prairie, Minn., outside Minneapolis, has been studying whether to change school boundaries to integrate an influx of Somali and Latin American immigrants who have transformed the school population from 90% Anglo in 2000 to 75% this school year.

    Well, what about the education?

    I don’t see anything positive that can come from uprooting children and sending them to schools for the sole purpose of allowing a school district to “balance” test scores and do better when it comes to hitting the targets set out by the so-called “No Child Left Behind” legislation that is still the law of the land. I’m not enthusiastic about repealing the law—I’m all for getting rid of the Department of Education entirely. If you want to have a simple Federal agency that sets and enforces funding and educational standards for all 50 states, fine, be my guest. The problem is, people in wildly different communities have competing agendas. Athletics versus academics, classroom size versus the length of the school day—where are the standards?

    I’m also tired of the “Not in my Backyard” mentality that exists out there. That’s fine for rich people like me—nothing goes into my backyard, except a few errant stick urchins, a handful of hungry deer, and my son, who maintains an ecologically unfriendly mink habitat. Your backyard is your business. Next time, don’t live where they’re putting that privately-owned prison with the flimsy walls. If the school board tells you that there’s no where to build a decent school, get off your duff and find out who’s lying to you.

    No one talks about the actual learning. If children leave school unable to read and write, that school has failed. Teaching to the test does not impart knowledge, nor does it prove that a skill has been transferred to the student.

    Thursday
    21Jan2010

    Betty Broderick Is Probably Going to Kill Me, Too

    Ever since I became single, girls have been tooting their horns

    I have no way of knowing if Betty Broderick is going to kill me, but, because I was a man who married a younger woman, I could certainly set her off and cause her to explode with unhinged rage. I don’t plan on sleeping nights if they let her out of prison:

    When Elisabeth “Betty” Broderick’s successful husband of 16 years dumped her for his young legal assistant, she seethed with a white-hot fury.

    She was one angry Betty, as a California writer, a long-time Broderick watcher, recently observed.

    She covered the walls of his house in San Diego with black spray-paint and drove her car through his front door. She left angry, obscenity-laced tirades on his answering machine. Then she crept into his bedroom early on a Sunday morning and shot him and his new wife to death.

    When she was arrested and tried in the early 1990s, she said she was the victim, telling a tale that resonated with many housewives who feared being replaced by younger women. Court-watchers broke into two camps, known as Betty-boosters and Betty-bashers.

    Now 62, Betty Broderick has been in prison longer than she was Mrs. Daniel Broderick. She wants to get out. And so, the case that spawned several books and two made-for-TV movies starring Meredith Baxter, the mom from the hit series “Family Ties,” is stirring strong emotions all over again.

    Broderick has a date Thursday with California’s parole board. It is the first time she has been eligible for release for the 1989 murders of Harvard-educated San Diego attorney Daniel T. Broderick, 44, and his wife of seven months, Linda Kolkena Broderick, 28.

    Whenever Miranda wants to upset me, she slips the DVD of the Meridith Baxter-Birney version of that film in the DVD player and sets it to play on auto-repeat. Then she plays it for the entire evening, at a deliberately low volume, so that it will play all night and so that I will awaken and hear the familiar dialogue from the movie. She does this because, in one of her classes at the University of Maryland, she learned about subliminal messages and the human unconscious. She knows that my advanced hearing will pick up the entirety of the film as it plays when I am asleep. She knows that my linear brain produces definite narratives—which means that I will internalize the pacing and the message of the film and it will become part of me.

    Miranda does this because I divorced her mother. Not because I “took up” with a younger woman. No, I divorced Miranda’s mother because Miranda’s mother divorced me. And she divorced me because she was having sex with Manuel, the pool boy. In the open. And in public. At the grocery store. You get my drift. And that’s why Miranda plays movies while I sleep.

    She also does this with The Muppets Take Manhattan, Benny & Joon, and Cher: Live in Las Vegas.

    Yeah.

    And I’m the weird one?

    Thursday
    21Jan2010

    Always Go For the Cheap Shots in Politics

    Someone at CNN has sent train-wreck correspondent Jeanne Moos after Scott Brown, and, as you can see above, she fails on multiple levels to accomplish anything.

    In our beauty-obsessed, vain and shallow culture, attacking a man for being handsome and charismatic is not going to work (see Mitt Romney). Attacking him for having beautiful daughters is not going to work (see George W. Bush). Attacking him for being hunky and for posing nude is not going to work (see Phil Gramm).

    We are rapidly headed to an anything goes mentality. The people don’t care if a candidate has a seedy past. They don’t care if he went to a good school. The people don’t care if a candidate sold drugs and went crazy and ate through a mattress trying to get at some powdered sugar sold to him by a transvestite in Las Vegas. They’re hip to that kind of thing. The American people like to get weird, and they like a man who has been getting weird right there with them.

    Going after Senator Brown for being colorful isn’t going to fly. He’s probably a one-term Senator, if that. But the elitism used to denigrate him is going to backfire.

    Thursday
    14Jan2010

    What's the Harm in Throwing Dice?

    Young Boys Playing Dice Bartolomé Esteban Murillo

    I’m afraid that a poor young man in New York is being dragged through the mud because his father is the governor:

    New York officials took Gov. David Paterson’s 15-year-old son, Alex Paterson, into custody Tuesday, after he was seen on an Upper West Side street, about two blocks from his school, rolling dice with a group of boys.

    Officials said the Manhattan cops asked Alex Paterson and four other 15-year-old boys for identification. They believed the boys might have been gambling on the street.

    Three boys gave identification and were allowed to leave. One boy initially gave the cops a hard time about giving them his name, while Paterson pulled out a bank card that did not have his name on it. According to the New York Daily News, the bank card was issued to another name and reported lost. Officials said.

    What’s the harm here? What chance does a fifteen year-old boy have with a bank card he may have found that had already been reported lost? If the card had been reported lost, then no merchant would accept it. So what?

    Now, if you can determine that he used the card before it was reported lost, so be it. Then it becomes a matter for the juvenile authorities. But, here’s a news flash—young people pick up things and hold on to them. They have their little secret lives. This is nothing new. Why should he be treated any differently because his father is the governor?

    Tuesday
    12Jan2010

    When Will the Derangement Stop?

    Screenshot, Sarah Palin video

    This is what you’ll find over at Andrew Sullivan’s blog:

    Well, this is the celebrity Alaskan when she was a sports announcer, something her college degree qualified her for perfectly

    It then leads to the embedded video, and above is the screenshot. When you play the video, that red box appears, and I did not click on it, nor did I bother with it past that.

    Of course, it is more than legitimate to take shots at Sarah Palin. Have at it. Denigrate her cheap education. Let’s not skip past the fact that our current state of economic ruin and our bleeding military situation overseas have both been created out of what was once peace and prosperity and brought into existence through the decisions of, and under the leadership of, the graduates of the finest schools in the country. So much for the smartest guys in the room.

    I don’t have any use for Sarah Palin. What, is she going to run for dog catcher? Then quit when someone waves a few bucks under her nose to go be a dog catcher somewhere else? Her stock vanished when she quit her job. That should have left the breathless and obsessed thumbsuckers with no one to be deranged about—perish that thought. When these same souls cannot get past a story that, for all intents and purposes, ended with little more than a whimper back in the late summer of 2008, you have to admit that 2010 isn’t going to be much of a year for them in terms of breaking new ground. In other words, expect nothing but derangement til the fever breaks.

    At the end of the day, you have a woman who poses no threat to the country, and no threat to holding elected office again. She is finished in American politics, and is going no where. She has limited support but a polarizing effect on too many Americans.

    Why continue with the derangement? Why continue using a child who has no place in this debate as a tool? I really am offended by the use of the child. You just have to leave the innocents out of the debate. Go after the adult Palins, go after them for what they say and do, and call it discourse. But to continually throw the presence of the child into the mix is the height of bad taste and a moral and intellectual bankruptcy usually found when someone becomes a third world dictator. What harm did the underage Palin children do to anyone in this country as their mother bombed out on the political stage?

    Why does that child, or any other child, have to be used to throw hits at your blog so that you can keep having a titter and a laugh at the expense of these backwards people who were thrust into the limelight? No conservative should ever go after the children of liberal politicians—that’s just cruel and unnecessary. No one should do that, period, no matter what their political stripe. How do you get people to behave? I think you have to condemn the behavior when and where you see it, and apply the condemnation honestly. No question, the Rush Limbaugh attacks on Chelsea Clinton were awful. We have not come very far since then. How do you evolve as a society? We really have a long way to go, don’t we?

    I wish I had had this platform years ago. I wish that I could have condemned Limbaugh for his awful statements at the time when they were said so that I could have the benefit of being consistent. This blog is a testament to trying to lay out a consistent set of beliefs. I am constantly searching out my own failings and if I do not admit them more often, please remind me. No condemnation should ever begin without an admission of self-guilt and personal failure, and I readily admit my own failure to be consistent. You should never attack someone’s children. My God, what a horror that is. How awful that is.

    What person can honestly say that a child with Down’s Syndrome is fair game in this or any debate?