An American Lion
Powered by Squarespace

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Rampage of the Innocents - My Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

Tags

 

Categories

An American Lion

The Monthly Archives

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system.

An American Lion

Talking Smack About Sports

The Things I Do

I’m a Mommy Blogger

The Admiral Hassenpfeffer

Rachel Ray’s Magnificent Ass

Ghost Ride The Whip

I Love My Guns More Than My Children

The Republican Party

Safe For Work Hotties

Money

BlogWithIntegrity.com _______________________

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Twingly BlogRank

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

Subscribe in Bloglines

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to netvibes

blogarama - the blog directory

TAMAZU: About Me Blogs

add page

http://www.wikio.com

http://www.wikio.com/

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Entries in Etiquette (12)

    Friday
    26Feb2010

    Another Obama Administration Aide is Thrown Out the Door

    The White House, 12 July 2009, Norman Rogers

    Not a surprise, but not exactly a great thing for the office of the Presidency, either:

    Desiree Rogers, the White House social secretary, plans to step down, three sources familiar with the situation told CNN Friday.

    Her office came under scrutiny after a couple who lacked an invitation showed up at President Barack Obama’s first state dinner.

    Officials with the White House and the administration, as well as a colleague of Rogers, told CNN of her plans to leave.

    UPDATE:In an e-mail to CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux, Rogers said she is headed back to the private sector.

    “It has been incredible setting the foundation for the WH for this historical Presidency,” she wrote.

    At least they didn’t trot out that old saw, “I want to spend more time with my family.”

    Have you met my family? I’d gladly accept a Federal position just to get out of having to spend any time at all with them. I wish I had gotten that Ambassadorship to Gambia in 2001; my life might have been so different. Oh well.

    What I take away from the incident with the Salahis is this—it got to the point in this country where someone thought they could crash the White House for a reality television show, thereby cheapening the highest office in the land. Something had to happen to snap things back in line, and this incident might have been it. Allowing Miss Rogers some time to serve and then leave was graceful, even if the handling of the incident was anything but.

    Friday
    26Feb2010

    Gaddafi's Swiss Derangement Continues

    Bern, Switzerland

    This won’t end:

    Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi has called for a jihad, or holy war, against Switzerland, as an ongoing diplomatic row between the two nations heats up.

    He criticised a recent Swiss vote against the building of minarets and said Muslims must boycott the country.

    There have been tensions between the nations since 2008, when one of Mr Gaddafi’s sons was arrested in Geneva, accused of assaulting two servants.

    A Swiss foreign ministry spokesman declined to comment on the jihad call.

    The Libyan leader made his comments while speaking at a meeting to mark the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad.

    “Let us wage jihad against Switzerland, Zionism and foreign aggression,” he said.

    While that all might sound like harmless talk, it’s hardly what we need to be hearing from Libya. In exchange for some measure of normalcy and improved economic ties to the West, Libya had to agree to certain things. This derangement against Switzerland was not one of those things. 

    Thursday
    25Feb2010

    The Most Awkward Handshake of the Year

    Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao, left, shakes hand with her Pakistani counterpart Salman Bashir before the start of a delegation level meeting, in New Delhi, Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010.

    It looks cordial, but it probably isn’t:

    India and Pakistanheld their first official talks Thursday since the 2008 Mumbai siege, with both sides saying they wanted to rebuild trust shattered in that attack but acknowledging that the meeting was just a first step toward a renewed peace process.

    The four-hour meeting between the nuclear-armed rivals ranged from shared water resources to the status of the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir. But terrorism was the focus of the discussions - an emphasis Pakistan quickly made clear would only slow further talks.

    “The only way forward is to engage meaningfully across the board, and not hold the relationship hostage” to the issue of terrorism, Pakistani Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir told reporters after the meetings. India has long argued that Pakistan has not done enough to rein in militants operating from its soil, an accusation that Pakistan denies.

    Expectations were extremely low for Thursday’s talks, which were seen as little more than a symbolic first meeting and which India had billed as “talks about talks.” Both sides indicated little of substance had been achieved.

    I’m still stunned by the Mumbai attack, and I have to pay tribute to the restraint of India. I really believed that, when Mumbai happened, we were going to see an all-out shooting war along the Kashmir frontier at a minimum and much, much worse at the maximum.

    Well, diplomacy always helps. I do think the lady does show a bit of skin here, however. Is that an accident or is that rubbing salt in a fundamentalist wound? Somewhere, a Taliban flunky is looking for a fainting couch after being shown the short sleeves of a professional woman in public.

    Wednesday
    09Dec2009

    Are They Really Incensed? How Can You Tell?

    Norwegians are a pretty even-keeled folk. How can you tell if they’re really mad about something? I don’t get this at all:

    Barack Obama’s trip to Oslo to pick up his Nobel peace award is in danger of being overshadowed by a row over the cancellation of a series of events normally attended by the prizewinner.

    Norwegians are incensed over what they view as his shabby response to the prize by cutting short his visit.

    The White House has cancelled many of the events peace prize laureates traditionally submit to, including a dinner with the Norwegian Nobel committee, a press conference, a television interview, appearances at a children’s event promoting peace and a music concert, as well as a visit to an exhibition in his honour at the Nobel peace centre.

    He has also turned down a lunch invitation from the King of Norway.

    According to a poll published by the daily tabloid VG, 44% of Norwegians believe it was rude of Obama to cancel his scheduled lunch with King Harald, with only 34% saying they believe it was acceptable.

    “Of all the things he is cancelling, I think the worst is cancelling the lunch with the king,” said Siv Jensen, the leader of the largest party in opposition, the populist Progress party. “This is a central part of our government system. He should respect the monarchy,” she told VG.

    The Norwegian Nobel committee, which awards the peace prize, dismissed the criticism. “We always knew that there were too many events in the programme. Obama has to govern the US and we were told early on that he could not commit to all of them,” said Geir Lundestad, secretary of the committee.

    Although Obama will not lunch with King Harald, he will see him on a visit to the royal palace.

    See? They “were told early on” that President Obama could “not commit to all of them.” So where is the outrage, then? If the Obama Administration told the organizers early on that he couldn’t make all of the traditional events, why are they up in arms in the first place?

    Ideologically opposed elements inside of Norway have seized upon something in order to make an American president look bad. That’s wrong. That’s a kneejerk response. President Obama has done nothing wrong, and this sort of thing should unite Americans. I realize that liberals would never say the same thing about President Bush, but still. Allow me to say that President Obama has every right to decline certain events and maintain his schedule. No foreign political intrigue need sully the reputation of our President.

    Sunday
    15Nov2009

    Amy Alkon is Still Peddling Her One Claim to Fame

    I’m speaking, of course, about America’s most celebrated insane bag of nuts blogger, one Amy Alkon, who seems to be interviewed here for her ability to be crazy and credibly so:

    Amy Alkon, a syndicated advice columnist and self-described “manners psycho,” certainly thinks so. Just ask “Barry,” a loud cellphone talker she encountered recently at a Starbucks in Santa Monica, Calif.

    “He just blatantly took over the whole place with his conversation, streaming his dull life into everybody’s brain,” Ms. Alkon recalled in a telephone interview.

    Among the personal details Barry shared that day — errands to run, plans for the evening — was his phone number, which Ms. Alkon jotted down.

    “I called him that night and said, ‘Just calling to let you know, Barry, that if you’d like your private life to remain private, you might want to be a little more considerate next time,’ “ she said.

    Alkon has no ethics, and I call bullshit:

    Someone who doesn’t tolerate inconsiderate public behaviour is Amy Alkon, the famous Advice Goddess columnist in the US who is also known as a blogslapper of ‘assclowns’. Recently, Amy was so annoyed by a ‘cell phone shouter’ in a LA café, she immediately posted personal details of the assclown’s conversation to her weblog. The icing on the cake was the assclown receiving calls directing her to Amy’s post, using the phone number she’d haplessly broadcast to all and sundry. Fittingly, one of Amy’s mottos is -revenge is the best revenge.

    Indeed, shaming websites catering for pissed-off victims of public arseholes are springing up with a vengeance. Check this Wall Street Journal article, inspired by Amy’s experience for a list of blogslapping websites. One potential site not yet created could cater for the common problem of locals and families terrorising the neighbourhood.

    Notice anything?

    That same incident happened in 2006, and Alkon continues to “peddle” the incident as something recent. So far, the Wall Street Journal and now the New York Times have passed off a single incident (and I’m guessing she’s dressing up the same incident and peddling it around—I could be wrong) as being something Alkon has done to unsuspecting people in the name of some sort of morally superior attempt at enforcing “ethics” and here’s what she did:

    Eva Burgess Is Getting Glasses!
    And she’s picking them up Saturday after 4pm! I know this because she was bellowing into a cell phone about it next to me in a café. Apparently, she’s not only inconsiderate, she doesn’t seeem to mind giving a lot of personal information, starting with her full name, to a total stranger.

    She continued, Eva and Ken Hashimoto “have insurance there,” she said…”under a flexible spending account.” “We just have to pay by the end of the year,” she said. And then she most helpfully bellowed her phone number — [REDACTED] — perhaps because she’s lonely and wants total strangers to call and ask how her glasses are working out for her.

    Hey, Eva, can I have your bank account number and your log-in so I can transfer a few bucks to my account? I’d like to get a pair of noise-canceling headphones in case you sit next to me again.

    On a positive note, the little girl with them, probably Eva’s (and maybe Ken’s) daughter, was very quiet and well-behaved.

    Hey, Eva, I know it’s kinda cold in NYC, where you’re apparently from (according to the area code you helpfully dispensed), but here in sunny southern California, at the moment you were talking, it was 58 degrees. Next time, you might take your business outside –- as exciting as I found it, on a morning I would normally have relaxed to the classical music while eating my breakfast and thinking my own thoughts, to instead be a part of your eyecare needs.

    Nice going, New York Times. That uncanny similarity is a little too uncanny for my tastes. If she’s been running around, doing this sort of thing for years, well, all well and good. But let’s not give her a pass on being the unethical-blogger-who-posts-someone’s-phone-number nonsense. I don’t care how offended someone is—posting their personal information crosses into Michelle Malkin territory.

    Sorry, @DQuenqua over there on Twitter. You’ve been punked by one of the least ethical human beings alive.  Cue 2011, and a rousing story in the Washington Post about how Amy Alkon smacked down someone by publishing their phone number on her blog…

    Friday
    13Nov2009

    Here's How You Lead by Example

    The Enola Gay

    There may or may not be a flap over whether or not President Obama should visit Hiroshima, Japan, but there is one thing I can tell you—apologizing for certain things doesn’t accomplish a damned thing.

    I can tell you what President Norman Rogers would do (stop laughing and bear with me here).

    President Rogers would gladly visit Hiroshima, and tour the museum and look at the displays. It is a terrible horror to use such weapons. The inhumanity of war is something we should all give sober consideration.

    Then, when the visit was complete, and when the media were assembled, President Rogers, me, in other words, would say, “I am honored to have been able to visit this site, but I have one thing to say to the Japanese people: start another war like the one you started in 1941 with the United States, and I can guarantee you, your whole country will look like Hiroshima. You say Hiroshima, I say Nanking—hey, let’s call the whole thing off. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m on my way to visit at least a dozen or more museums throughout the Pacific Rim that testify to the brutality of your military and what it did to millions of innocent people until we put a stop to it.”

    I’m sure the Japanese people would just love that. See, there’s an article out today that sort of puts the bombing of Hiroshima in a slightly different historical context:

    Marine researchers have found a pair of Imperial Japanese Navy submarines on the sea floor off Hawaii’s Oahu Island – vessels so advanced for their day they would provide plenty of fodder for a fresh novel by Tom Clancy.

    Known by their vessel numbers, the I-14 was a 375-foot submarine aircraft carrier – its crew capable of assembling and launching two float-plane bombers in roughly 20 minutes. The other craft, the I-201, was an attack submarine, twice as fast as any in the US fleet and faster than subs in any other Navy during World War II.

    “This is one of the most significant marine-heritage findings in recent years,” according to Hans Van Tilburg, a marine archaeologist who is the maritime-heritage coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Sanctuaries in the Pacific. The find was announced Thursday.

    “These submarines are 60-year-old time capsules offering first-hand insight into a military technology that was far ahead of its time,” he says. The subs were so advanced, Mr. Van Tilburg continues, that had they appeared earlier in the war and in larger numbers, “the submarines had the potential to turn the tide of war.”

    Among the approaches Japanese designers used: a rubbery coating on the outside of the hull and conning tower to absorb radar and reduce the likelihood that sonar aboard US destroyers or subs would pick up sounds from inside the Japanese vessels.

    The aircraft-bearing subs were designed to bring the war to the US mainland and strategic choke points such as the Panama Canal by hiding offshore and releasing the single-engine bombers on what would be one-way missions. The tactic Japanese war planners envisioned provided a chilling foretaste of tactics the US and Russian navies would use with their ballistic-missile submarines during and after the cold war.

    That fact, plus the fact that the Japanese were sending up balloons filled with explosives, the fact that they fought literally to the last man on Iwo Jima, and the fact that Japan was under the control of a military dictatorship sort makes Harry Truman’s decision look like nothing I’d want to apologize for.

    Now, I might want to have my speech writers work on an apology for my diplomatic faux pas, which I would then have delivered to the Japanese embassy by the deputy Secretary of State’s personal driver and wrapped in a pair of underwear, or I might just say that we can pass on the apology, since Japan can’t seem to figure out how to properly apologize to the Koreans and the Chinese and to all of the other people who suffered under their brutal occupation. You see, I have a slight problem with historical revisionism and Japanese nationalism. They’re making a comeback, and have been for years, and that has a lot of people nervous.

    And, really, this is why the United States should never start a war, but should always finish a war.