An American Lion

This is where Norman Rogers practices the manly art of curation.

Custom Search

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system. The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton seduced the women of the town and solved crimes, all while subsisting on a steady diet of depravity and confusion.

Rampage of the Innocents is my unfinished but brilliant Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

  Archives

Categories

drupal statistics module

PageRank Checker

TopOfBlogs

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

BlogRankers.com

Blogs lists and reviews

 

blogarama - the blog directory

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

add page

http://www.wikio.com

Seed Newsvine

http://www.wikio.com/

Powered by Squarespace
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    An American Lion

    Entries in Energy (37)

    Friday
    Aug132010

    Calm Down About Bushehr

    Bushehr Nuclear Power Plants I and IIAre you aware of the fear mongering that has gone with the idea that Iran is making a nuclear weapon that it will give to terrorists in order to destroy Israel? Did you know that Israel already possesses over a hundred nuclear weapons and that any state that employs one against Israel is finished?

    Let's face the facts here. The Bushehr Nuclear Power facility is as old as the hills--it was dreamed up by the Shah of Iran. It was built by the Russians. It's a light water nuclear reactor, and light water reactors aren't really much good for creating weapons.

    Anyway, it comes on line this week, and the fear mongering has begun in earnest:

    Russia's nuclear agency says it will load fuel into Iran's first nuclear power plant next week, marking the start of its launch.

    "The fuel will be loaded on August 21," Rosatom spokesman Sergei Novikov said. "This is the start of the physical launch (of the reactor)."

    A ceremony will mark the start-up, Novikov also said, and from that moment the Bushehr plant will be officially considered a nuclear-energy facility.

    Loading the reactor with fuel will be a key step toward starting up the reactor at the Islamic Republic's first nuclear power plant, Novikov said, though the reactor would not be considered operational from that date.

    Russian officials said that the latest U.N. sanctions against Iran wouldn't affect the Bushehr project.

    Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said on March 18 that Russia planned to start up the reactor at the Bushehr plant in the summer of 2010.

    Sanctions don't really matter when it comes to the facility at Bushehr because it is, as I said, a light water reactor system. Lots of countries with dubious resumes either have this type of technology or are getting it:

    The VVER (From RussianВодо-водяной энергетический реактор; transliterates as Vodo-Vodyanoi Energetichesky Reactor;Water-Water Energetic Reactor) is a series of pressurised water reactors (PWRs) developed by the Soviet Union and used byArmeniaBulgariaChinaCzech RepublicFinland, former East GermanyHungaryIndiaIranSlovakiaUkraine, and theRussian Federation.

    The earliest VVERs were built before 1970. The VVER-440 Model V230 is the most common design, delivering 440 MW of electrical power. The V230 employs six primary coolant loops each with a horizontal steam generator. A modified version of VVER-440, Model V213, was a product of the first nuclear safety standards adopted by Soviet designers. This model includes added emergency core cooling and auxiliary feedwater systems as well as upgraded accident localization systems. The larger VVER-1000 was developed after 1975 and is a four-loop system housed in a containment-type structure with a spray steamsuppression system. VVER reactor designs have been elaborated to incorporate automatic control, passive safety and containment systems associated with Western third generation nuclear reactors.

    VVER series nuclear reactors were also scaled down in size and used by the Soviet Navy and RFAS nuclear submarine fleet as well as by surface warships.

    The Russian abbreviation VVER stands for water-cooled, water-moderated energy reactor. This describes the pressurized water reactor design. Reactor fuel rods are fully immersed in water kept at 15 MPa of pressure so that it does not boil at normal (220 to over 300 °C) operating temperatures. Water in the reactor serves both as a coolant and a moderator which is an importantsafety feature. Should coolant circulation fail the neutron moderation effect of the water diminishes, reducing reaction intensity and compensating for loss of cooling, a condition known as negative void coefficient. The whole reactor is encased in a massive steel pressure shell. Fuel is low enriched (ca. 2.4–4.4% 235U) uranium dioxide (UO2) or equivalent pressed into pellets and assembled into fuel rods.

    In order to "weaponize" any aspect of what this type of facility makes use of, the entire facility has to be shut down. This is easy to detect. Should a complete shutdown out of cycle occur, the world will know about it through monitoring methods I won't describe here. This is not the type of facility that can produce weaponized plutonium, and that's the key to understanding why there is going to be a great deal of fear mongering. The isotope needed for making a plutonium weapon is P-239; the way that this facility works, the less than useful isotopes P-240 and so on are produced.

    Nevertheless, Iran is prepared to defend Bushehr:

    In an effort to ward off future airstrikes against Bushehr and other strategic sites, Iran has sought to purchase Tor-M1, Tor-M1T, and S-300 surface-to-air missiles from Russia. According to reports, Russia agreed in December 2001 to sell S-300 PMU-01 missiles and to train Iranian personnel in how to operate the system. While it was unclear whether or not such units would be stationed in the immediate vicinity of the reactor facility, existing IKONOS imagery as of 2002 did not indicate an air defense presence.

    Any fool can scare you; it takes a little analysis of your own to see why this facility is no threat to Israel or world peace or to the idea that Iran can start a weapons program. Iran is an irrational actor, however. I support containment and deterrence; going to war with Iran over this facility is ridiculous however, since it does not violate any of the non-proliferation treaties that Iran has signed on to. Should Iran take any step to shut down the facility or disable monitoring systems designed to prevent the weaponization of material produced by the facility, I would have no problem with efforts to disable or destroy the facility. I think Iran needs the economic boost that the plant provides, however. I think Iran realizes that this is a prestige move, and it is not to be ruined trying to build a weapon that it can never use or deploy.

    Should Iran be watched and sanctioned? Absolutely. But I wouldn't listen to people who are panicking about Bushehr; they are sadly misinformed as to what the thing actually does.

    Monday
    Aug092010

    Infrastructure is Everything When You Absolutely Have to Have It

    One of the things that always smacks me in the face when I point to the need for some measure of austerity in this country is the reality that we cannot scrimp on spending on infrastructure.

    This backs up the sharp attacks on my beliefs on that subject:

    Experts on the nation's electricity system point to a frighteningly steep increase in non-disaster-related outages affecting at least 50,000 consumers.

    During the past two decades, such blackouts have increased 124 percent -- up from 41 blackouts between 1991 and 1995, to 92 between 2001 and 2005, according to research at the University of Minnesota.

    In the most recently analyzed data available, utilities reported 36 such outages in 2006 alone.

    "It's hard to imagine how anyone could believe that -- in the United States -- we should learn to cope with blackouts," said University of Minnesota Professor Massoud Amin, a leading expert on the U.S. electricity grid.

    Amin supports construction of a nationwide "smart grid" that would avert blackouts and save billions of dollars in wasted electricity.

    In a nutshell, a smart grid is an automated electricity system that improves the reliability, security and efficiency of electric power. It more easily connects with new energy sources, such as wind and solar, and is designed to charge electric vehicles and control home appliances via a so-called "smart" devices.

    There, my bullshit has been refuted. But, I will point out, any research into the "rolling blackout" phenomenon has to take into account the manipulations of energy traders.

    Wednesday
    Jul212010

    My Guess is That They Will do Nothing

    Do you see something melting? I don't see anything melting.Don't expect a solution to this problem any time soon:

    This city just endured its hottest June since records began in 1872, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. So did Miami. Atlanta suffered its second-hottest June, and Dallas had its third hottest.

    In New York, the weather was relatively pleasant: only the fourth-hottest June since 1872. Then again, New York is on pace for its hottest July on record.

    Yet when United States senators and their aides file into work on Wednesday, on yet another 90-degree day, they may be on the verge of deciding to do approximately nothing about global warming. The needed 60 votes don’t seem to be there, at least not at the moment.

    Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader, and President Obama may still find a way to cobble together the votes, as they did on health care and financial regulation. Perhaps they can somehow persuade moderate Republicans to support a market-based limit on power plant emissions — a policy that power plants themselves seem open to.

    The solution requires strategic thinking, of which we have none. The solution requires planning, and there's none of that being done. The solution requires a partnership between government and business, and populism has killed that notion. The solution requires the innovation of small business start ups, but the costs of health care are too great right now, thanks to backwards thinking.

    In short, build more coal-fired power plants, and soon, because we're going to need to beef up the power grid and create more supplies of electricity in order to run more air conditioners.

    Wednesday
    Jul142010

    Good For You, Larry Hagman

    You could do a lot worse than trying to get people to use solar power.

    Television star Larry Hagman now serves as a spokesman for solar power issues, turning the tables on the oil baron character that he once played.

    I used to be a skeptic. Then, we moved back to Germany. Well, we didn't move here so much as we fled here when the Caribbean turned out to be a major no-go after all of the trouble I caused the previous year as a Gentleman Bounty Hunter (don't ask). My brother owns several homes here, and Father still owns several hundred acres of potato-growing land north of the old city of Speyer that he bought after the war from some starving orphans (again, do not ask).

    One thing is certain, though--the Germans are usually nice to you when you take care of the environment. Solar panels are everywhere. I can look out any window and see fifty or more panels in any given direction. People align them, swear by them, and use them. 

    It's not 1985 anymore. I am the world's biggest hater of all things liberal, hippie and otherwise. But I'm sold on solar power. You see, the thing is--it uses the sun to make electricity. Up until now, I had no idea that that's what solar power was. I thought it was something liberals talked about in order to make me switch the television off.

    Tuesday
    Jul062010

    Air Conditioning is the Great Evil of our Time

    Air ConditionerI fully expect people to guffaw and lift their nose at this, but I happen to agree. Air conditioning is now history's greatest disaster, worse than anything our world has ever gone up against:

    In the last half century, air conditioning has joined fireworks, swimming pools and charred hamburgers as a ubiquitous ingredient of an American summer. It’s no exaggeration to say it has changed the way this country functions, shaping everything from where we’re willing to live (Las Vegas, anyone?) to the amount of sex we have (more: It’s never too hot to get it on when the A.C. is blasting). Nine out of 10 new homes in this country are built with central air conditioning, and Americans now use as much electricity to power our A.C. as the entire continent of Africa uses for, well, everything. It has so thoroughly scrambled our way of life that when the National Academy of Engineering chose its 20 greatest engineering accomplishments of the last century, A.C. not only made the list, it clocked in ahead of spacecraft, highways and even the Internet.

    But as science writer Stan Cox argues in his new book, "Losing Our Cool: Uncomfortable Truths About Our Air-Conditioned World (and Finding New Ways to Get Through the Summer)," the dizzying rise of air conditioning comes at a steep personal and societal price. We stay inside longer, exercise less, and get sick more often — and the electricity used to power all that A.C. is helping push the fast-forward button on global warming. The invention has also changed American politics: Love it or hate it, refrigerated cooling has been a major boon to the Republican Party. The advent of A.C. helped launch the massive Southern and Western population growth that’s transformed our electoral map in the last half century. Cox navigates all of these scientific and social angles with relative ease, providing a clear explanation of how A.C. made the leap from luxury to necessity in the United States and examining how we can learn to manage the addiction before we refrigerate ourselves into the apocalypse.

    Mr. Cox explains how people have come to be dependent on air conditioning and how it affects their health. Now, from personal experience, I can heartily recommend what he's saying.

    Having spent the last few years in Central Maryland, the heat there is stifling and the air conditioning pervasive. The humidity was always a nightmare for me because I tend to sweat profusely whenever the temperature hits 80 degrees or more. We spent thousands of dollars each year keeping the house cool. 

    Compare that with Germany. The home where we live now has no air conditioning. No one has it. No one needs it. And we regularly hit 80 degrees in the summer. The weather and climate here are much cooler, granted, but even when there is warm weather, one opens up the house and uses a few fans to cool the house. We have skylights and large windows that can be tilted open or left open to let cool air in and hot air out through the roof.

    This may not be scientific, but when we last lived in Maryland, our sinus issues, family-wide, were legendary. We were accused of being manufacturers of methamphetamine--that's how much Sudafed we were using.

    After a few months abroad, all of our issues are cleared up. Everyone feels better. Everyone sleeps better and there are no issues. We are inundated with fresh air and cool breezes and we spend a great deal more time outdoors. And don't forget the walking. The walking keeps us fit and trim. Except Miranda--cankles! Not good.

    If at all possible, cut the air conditioning out of your life. Granted, if you live in Texas, you have to have it. I get that. But if you can open some windows and do without it, you'll feel better.

    Sunday
    Jul042010

    Months of Misery Ahead

    Solar CollectorsThis doesn't seem like the sort of happy news one would expect on the 4th of July:

    Hundreds of skimming boats prepared Friday to return to calmer gulf waters in the wake of Hurricane Alex and resume cleanup of the massive BP oil spill, which scientists now predict is likely to reach the Florida Keys and Miami in the months ahead.

    Using computer simulations based on 15 years of wind and ocean current data, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a 
    report Friday showing a 61% to 80% chance of the oil spill reaching within 20 miles of the coasts of the Florida Keys, Fort Lauderdale and Miami, mostly likely in the form of weathered tar balls.

    Shorelines with the greatest chance of being soiled by oil — 81% to 100% — stretch from the Mississippi River Delta to the western Florida Panhandle, NOAA scientists said in a
    statement on its projections for the next four months.

    Who's to say that it won't go further? Who's to say that the Caribbean as a whole won't be affected in some way before the oil is washed out of the Gulf of Mexico and into the Atlantic Ocean? Tar balls and oil balls and dead things and poisoned waters will wash up in unexpected places for years, perhaps. I don't know.

    I do know one thing--without figuring out how to contain and clean up these sorts of spills, there's just no way that further deep-sea oil drilling should continue. I get that we need this oil and that we need the jobs. I think that it is well past time to re-design and re-tool and start the long process of moving away from oil with serious efforts. Two billion for solar power just isn't anywhere near enough.

    Monday
    Jun282010

    No, You Can't Cap This Oil Well

    Thar she blows (until a relief well can lessen the pressure)

    Every time they say they can cap this oil well down in the Gulf of Mexico, I just laugh myself silly thinking about how many idiots out there will buy it:

    A new containment cap that BP plans to place over the leaking oil well in the Gulf of Mexico has the potential to halt the flow of crude oil in mid-July, a BP executive said Monday.

    In a technical briefing for reporters, BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells said that replacement of the oil containment cap with a bigger cap, which could happen as soon as two weeks, could stop the oil leak under the right circumstances.

    “A lot depends on the pressure response we see,” he said. “… If the capability is there to stop the flow, we’ll do that.”

    If successful, the new capping operation would cut several weeks off BP’s previous estimate of when it would be able to shut off the leak by drilling a relief well.

    West said that the relief well operation is continuing to make good progress and has come within 20 feet of the Macando well that has been spewing oil into the Gulf since April 20. From here, engineers plan to drill another 900 feet or so vertically, paralleling the runaway well and conducting “ranging” tests to ensure they are locked onto the target.

    Why would he tout the "cap" and still refer to the relief well? If they cap the well, then there's no need for a relief well is there?

    Well, here's why he's saying that--the relief well is the only thing that will help reduce the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. The relief well is all that matters at this point. Nothing else will work and nothing else matters because too much oil is blowing through a hole that is far too powerful to be capped or stopped by anything that BP can lower one mile into the ocean.

    It's a public relations move. They have to appear to be doing something, no matter how fruitless, and they don't care if people like me notice their bullshit. Do I work for MSNBC or some other large news organization? No, of course not. Those people are rock stupid and can be bamboozled into believing anything.

    Sunday
    Jun272010

    It's a Great Idea to Clean Up the Animals, But...

    Here's what I don't get.

    You find an animal--a wild animal--covered in oil, and you scrub it and clean it and save it.

    Wonderful. Kudos to you for braving the claws and the feathers and teeth and the fear of the animal.

    Then you have to let it go, preferably in an area where there isn't any oil.

    So, after you've gone through the trouble to clean one bird, or one turtle, or one duck--what's to stop the animal from getting all covered in oil again? It's not like the animal knows how to avoid the oil in the first place, right? Otherwise, why would you be cleaning it? The BP oil spill isn't a localized thing. It's everywhere. It's ongoing. Oil will continue to pump out of that hole for months, apparently. Months. So, even if you scrub up ducky and his pals, aren't they just going to get all gunked up with oil when they flit away and go somewhere a mile away and start trying to do whatever it is they do?

    I applaud the effort. I just wonder if it makes sense.

    Saturday
    Jun262010

    Why Not Buy a Thousand?

    Generic picture of what might be an oil spillIf I was the chump running BP, I'd make a show of buying a THOUSAND centrifuges that could separate oil from water. A THOUSAND! And I would insist that the media write it as A THOUSAND so that fools everywhere could see that I cared. About, well, the oil in the water, I guess.

    Kevin Costner is one of my favorite actors, and he's no stranger to scandals involving people hire to give him massages. He and Al Gore share more than that in common (no, I don't think either incident was anything more than a glorified shakedown) because they care about the environment and want to do things.

    Costner has a product that--get this--separates oil from water:

    It was treated as an oddball twist in the otherwise wrenching saga of the BP oil spill when Kevin Costner stepped forward to promote a device he said could work wonders in containing the spill's damage. But as Henry Fountain explains in the New York Timesthe gadget in question — an oil-separating centrifuge — marks a major breakthrough in spill cleanup technology. And BP, after trial runs with the device, is ordering 32 more of the Costner-endorsed centrifuges to aid the Gulf cleanup. 

    The "Waterworld" actor has invested some $20 million and spent the past 15 years in developing the centrifuges. He helped found a manufacturing company, Ocean Therapy Solutions, to advance his brother's research in spill cleanup technology. In testimony beforeCongress this month, Costner walked through the device's operation—explaining how it spins oil-contaminated water at a rapid speed, so as to separate out the oil and capture it in a containment tank[...]

    When I went looking for examples of how these things work, I found this one:

    Oil and Water Separating Centrifuge

    And this one:

    Oil and Water Separator

    And I probably could have found a few more, but you get the picture. These devices can handle limited amounts of salt water or fresh water before they have to be shut down and maintained. There has to be a plan to deploy them and a place to put the oil. Can they clean up the whole ocean? No. But they could be deployed in areas where the oil is very concentrated and they could remove oil from the water. That's about it. And that's worthwhile. It's not a fix, nor is it something we should get excited about, but it's better than sitting on our asses crying, so I'm all for it.

    Oh, and then there's this--six years ago, Clarkson University researches developed a deepwater oil spill modeling program--has that been used so far?

    Time is the enemy when combating an accidental oil or gas release, especially when the leak takes place in water a half-mile deep or more. "Knowing where the spill will surface so you can have clean-up crews in place can mitigate some of the environmental impact," says Clarkson University Professor and Researcher Poojitha Yapa.

    As exploration goes ever deeper into the world's oceans to satisfy our global thirst for energy, the production of oil and gas from extremely deep wells is increasing dramatically. Yet, until recently oil companies and governments had no way of knowing what happens to gas or oil if accidentally released at extreme depths of 2,500 feet or more. Predicting how the oil would spread and where slicks would surface was pretty much guesswork. Variables like the chemical composition of oil and gas, ocean currents, deepwater pressure, and temperature influence the thermodynamic and hydrodynamic laws that govern the oil and gas spills as they ascend from the ocean bottom to the water surface. At those depths it can take several hours, or even days for a spill to reach the surface.

    It was this critical need to understand the behavior of oil and gas released at extreme depths that drove Clarkson University researchers, under the direction of Yapa, to develop a deepwater oil spill computer model. The project took four years and was sponsored by the United States Minerals Management Services (MMS) and a deep-spill task force consortium made up of more than 20 oil companies. The computer model, named CDOG by Yapa and his team, can closely simulate the behavior of oil or gas from a well blowout in very deep water.

    Though the industry safety record has been very good to date, Yapa says, "as deepwater oil and gas exploration increases, our models become extremely valuable for contingency planning, ecological risk assessment, and decision making during emergencies."

    Or is this simply too old to be relevant? I found a pretty nifty looking one here, and then I found this nutty one here:

    Screenshot of an actual comment, ad links disabled

    You read that right--six days BEFORE the BP Oil Spill, some panicky son of a bitch was screaming for an oil spill modeling program. So I'm just curious as to why there isn't a more up to date program in use by the oil companies, and if there is, okay, then.

    Thursday
    Jun242010

    Who Oiled Up a Dolphin?

    This sounds like a staged photo op:

    Florida saw its worst impact yet from the BP (BP.L) (BP.N) oil spill as thick oily sludge washed ashore on Pensacola Beach on Wednesday and emergency workers found an oil-covered dolphin stranded on the shore.

    State emergency workers said the pudding-like mixture covered 3 miles (5 km) of Pensacola Beach, a barrier island that is part of the Gulf Islands National Seashore.

    "It's just a line of black all the way down the beach as far as you can see in both directions. It's ruined," said Steve Anderson, a Pensacola fisherman.

    Small tar balls have washed ashore intermittently on beaches in the tourism-dependent western Florida Panhandle in the last couple of weeks, but large slicks of oil and tarry mats floated in on Wednesday.

    Governor Charlie Crist toured the area, prodding the oily goo with a stick in the Casino Beach section of Pensacola Beach.

    "We've seen tar balls but never this kind of stuff," the Pensacola News-Journal quoted the governor as saying.

    The oil-covered dolphin was found in the area affected by the sludge, near Fort Pickens. With the help of the Coast Guard, emergency workers kept it wet until a wildlife decontamination crew arrived.

    Nothing brings people out to the beach like the overwhelming smell of gasoline, am I right? Probably not a photo op. The sight of oil balls and sickened dolphins is an absolute killer for tourism and Florida lives or dies by tourism.

    Sarcasm aside, it sounds like the good people of Florida are going to have to sit down and figure out what to do about the oil that is coming ashore. Where do you put the entire beach after you've scooped it up? The stuff is so plentiful that it will wash ashore for months on end, brought there by the currents and suspended in the sand. What an absolute mess.

    How do you put a value on a single mile of Florida beach, however? What's a mile of Florida beachfront property worth in terms of compensation and penalties for BP (or the sub-contractor that is really responsible or whatever)? I would not want to have to sit down and mark up that scorecard.