An American Lion

This is where Norman Rogers practices the manly art of curation.

Custom Search

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system. The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton seduced the women of the town and solved crimes, all while subsisting on a steady diet of depravity and confusion.

Rampage of the Innocents is my unfinished but brilliant Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

  Archives

Categories

drupal statistics module

PageRank Checker

TopOfBlogs

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

BlogRankers.com

Blogs lists and reviews

 

blogarama - the blog directory

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

add page

http://www.wikio.com

Seed Newsvine

http://www.wikio.com/

Powered by Squarespace
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    An American Lion

    Entries in Democrat (75)

    Thursday
    Sep022010

    Conservatives Are Praying For Liberals to Act Like Pussies

    There is a bit of a dispute building in the “liberal” movement over a book written by the young man who set up the “Daily Kos” website. I go over there and have a great belly laugh when I want to come up with examples of things that only a hairy-legged fifty year-old woman with no sense of style or taste would have to say about politics. It’s a site too dismal to contemplate. There is absolutely no humor to be found there, only earnest self-aggradizing and personal absorption on a scale not to be believed.

    This fellow “Kos” has a book that compares the nuttier elements of the Right in this country with the Taliban. Aside from cheapening the idea that the Taliban actually do maim and kill people, there is a grain of truth when we compare all fundamentalists to one another; fundamentalism is a sort of totalitarianism that still has a measure of cachet in this world. It’s what you ascribe to when you want people to think you are serious and committed to something.

    Anyway, the real lesson here is that “high mindedness” is the real problem that liberals face in this country. They are counting on conservatives to be honest (no one ever made much money by being absolutely, totally, and completely honest) and they are counting on receiving points for being good and perfect. In other words, this is a form of complaining about the refs and hoping that being a “pussy” will help you come out on top. I hate to break it to you, and be so crude as to use the term “pussies”, but there it is:

    Listen, I have no problem with throwing punches and fighting the good fight against the forces of wealth and regression. And I won’t hesitate to attack the conservative movement for its sexism, racial resentment and monomaniacal devotion to enriching the privileged. But there’s a vast difference between that, and stressing a moral equivalence between the right and the Taliban. The former is true and focuses our aim for the battles ahead, the latter, as Patrick Appel writes at the Daily Dish, doesn’t “accomplish anything besides juicing book sales and temporarily riling up like-minded folk.”

    Hell, Kos admits as much when he describes the purpose of his book, “Because look, this book, ultimately, is a big ‘fuck you’ to every conservative who has ever accused us of wanting the terrorists to win.” Kos isn’t Paul Revere; he isn’t warning us about some incipient threat to our safety; he’s trying to get back at conservatives who accuse liberals of hating their country. Which, as I said in my review, is fair; Kos has never claimed to be an honest broker for the truth. But the fight for progress doesn’t require us to bend the truth or distort our opponents’ ideas; we can wage this war as we always have, by fighting for our values and giving the right the rope it needs to hang itself. Sure, “fuck you” feels good, but the moment you turn to smears is the moment you concede the weakness of your own position.

    The conservative movement is a perfect example of what happens when you let dishonesty consume your argument. In its drive to demonize liberals, it has become an incoherent mass of rage and resentment, devoid of anything approximating a governing agenda. The right has become so doctrinaire that it has lost its capacity for self-correction. This year’s Republicans will win because of high unemployment and poor growth, not because the American people have suddenly become more receptive to conservatism (they haven’t).

    The headline of the piece that I’m quoting above is “No, Really. We Shouldn’t Adopt Conservative Tactics.”

    Really? And don’t you think that the people who oppose you are praying that enough liberals will come out and say such a thing? I guess you don’t want to win, do you? Winning might make you think less of yourself. I assure you—that’s not a problem that your opponent has right now.

    Being high minded makes you feel good about yourself while you watch others make decisions about your life. Enjoy oblivion. The fellow who wants it more is going to take this country from you and you will be left to study the dishonest ways employed to beat you.

    Actually, if you came out and said “we will beat them only when we play the game better and harder than they do” I would have been shocked. Surely, no one with a deep-seated sense of self-importance would tape nickels to their knuckles and go down to the town square and fight to hold on to their way of life, right? That’s for the little people who donate money to keep your web site up and running.

    Wednesday
    Sep012010

    When You Mock a Popular Movement, You Take the Devil by the Horns

    Let’s hear more of those “tea bagger” jokes:

    Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska conceded late Tuesday in her Republican primary race against Joe Miller, a lawyer from Fairbanks who was backed by Tea Party activists, Sarah Palin and other conservatives.

    Mr. Miller shocked the political establishment here and in Washington last week when he emerged with a narrow lead, 1,668 votes, after the primary vote, on Aug. 24. His victory makes him the presumed favorite to win the Senate seat from this heavily Republican state.

    Mr. Miller, who has proposed drastic cuts in federal spending, had trailed badly in local polls in the weeks before the election but benefited from a last-minute flood of advertisements, mailings and automated calls casting Ms. Murkowski as a Democrat in disguise. An abortion-related ballot measure also brought conservatives to the polls.

    Many people said Ms. Murkowski’s failure to respond aggressively to Mr. Miller’s attacks, including some that distorted her voting record, had played an important role in her defeat. But she suggested on Tuesday that she had no regrets.

    “I’m so proud of the campaign that we conducted,” she told reporters at her campaign headquarters here as dozens of friends and family members surrounded her and cheered. “It was honest. It was upright. It was energetic. It was what a campaign in Alaska should be.”

    A loyal sitting Republican Senator has been blown out of the water in her home state. Can the winner of that primary hold the seat for conservatives or will the state of Alaska be represented by two Democrats?

    Stranger things have happened. This is an object lesson in snark. The snark, as perpetrated by elitist liberals, doesn’t carry any weight with people who vote in primaries. You may be a joke to the Kos crowd and the kids who haunt liberal blogs, but if you can win with the voters, what does any of that matter?

    The only thing that matters is winning. If you can’t figure out how to win, even when all of the witty bloggers armed with snark and Photoshop pictures of you with a set of balls bouncing off your forehead are against you, then don’t worry about a thing. They are consumed by their immature hatred of everything that they have been told to look down the end of their nose at; so much for a world where liberals are the adults in charge, right?

    Wednesday
    Sep012010

    Ed Schultz Does Not Know Why People Have Rejected Him

    The delusions of Ed Schultz are beginning to form their own legend:

    In the insecure world of show business, there’s nothing worse than the feeling of being upstaged. That’s why for libtalker Ed Schultz, the thought of a cable rival pulling off a wildly successful event such as Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally is painful to endure.

    Of course, ideological politics are heavily at play here as well, that’s why Schultz sees a role for his pinky ring-wearing thug pals: with union help, we could EASILY top Beck’s turnout!

    Schultz doesn’t understand the concept of commercial broadcasting; he has achieved about as much as he’s ever going to achieve and no amount of “gaming” the system is going to help him do any better. This is where the wave breaks on the shore and pulls him back down into a local gig talking to himself at 3 AM. It’s really very sad, when you think about it. If only all of the famous, powerful liberals of the day would give him hours and hours of their time in order to give him mediocre ratings, right? Well, that ship has sailed. Schultz will disappear any day now, and no one will take note of his removal.

    I have mentioned this before, but there’s no better indication as to what happened to the liberal movement than to see that Air America is gone and conservative institutions are thriving, such as Blackwater (Xe) and Fox News. Remember when they were going to take over things and show us how things work when the adults are in charge? What we really got was bullshit and corruption. Look at them line their pockets and run for the hills. Schultz has turned-out pockets and a dusty nickel to show for his efforts and that’s why he’s so foaming-at-the-mouth angry. Everyone cashed in except him.

    So much for the revolution. Does Ed Schultz realize that even liberals don’t like him very much?

    Tuesday
    Aug102010

    The Divide Between the President and His Base Widens

    If you didn't see this coming, shame on you:

    The White House is simmering with anger at criticism from liberals who say President Obama is more concerned with deal-making than ideological purity.

    During an interview with The Hill in his West Wing office, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs blasted liberal naysayers, whom he said would never regard anything the president did as good enough.

    "I hear these people saying he’s like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested," Gibbs said. "I mean, it's crazy."

    The press secretary dismissed the “professional left” in terms very similar to those used by their opponents on the ideological right, saying, "They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we’ve eliminated the Pentagon. That’s not reality."

    Of those who complain that Obama caved to centrists on issues such as healthcare reform, Gibbs said: “They wouldn’t be satisfied if Dennis Kucinich was president."

    What gets people excited about supporting the Obama administration is when a high ranking official from this administration delivers a windmill-style fankick to the seat of the pants of the people who oppose their agenda. Instead, the high road gets taken. Rarely does the intellectual dishonesty of this president’s opponents come into the sort of mocking that would drive it back underground.

    So far, the high road isn’t working. Why isn’t someone trumpeting the fact that the American auto industry is coming back? Why isn’t someone explaining how a draw down in Iraq is going to help the military? Why isn’t someone going after the obstructionism of the Republican caucus in the Senate?

    Money.

    When you are beholden to money, you worship it like a slave. This administration rarely does anything of substance that will cost them the support of the people who really write the checks. Ironically, this was an administration swept into power by the small donors who gave $25 or so. They must be counting on the loss of that money. They are playing for a 50-49 win in November 2012. They are not doing anything to make a liberal swoon with approval or love.

    Thursday
    Jul292010

    Howard Dean Escalates the Identity Crisis in the Democrat Party

    Many wish Howard Dean had retired to a farm in VermontThings like this tend to make political operatives throw telephones out of the window:

    I admire Nancy Pelosi because she is tough, gets things done, and doesn't take crap from the right wing or any one else. After the year and a half this country has just been through, it is pretty obvious that the right-wing has no intention of cooperating with anyone, and that they will do anything to regain power, just as they were willing to do anything to hold on to it. The only reasonable approach is to stand up to them as you would any group of bullies. Call them out for what they do- or don't do as the case may be. If the Tea Party can call out some of their own members, surely we can call out a group of people who have put their party ahead of their country.

    I have often said the biggest problem with the Democrats is that we are not tough enough. Now is the time to be tough. The fact is that the stimulus package has reduced unemployment from where it would have otherwise been in this Bush-induced recession (based on policies most of the Republicans now in Congress voted for). The fact is, as 60 members of the House and the CBO showed last week, the Public Option, or Medicare Buy-in, as it should more correctly be called, would have reduced the deficit over ten years by an additional $68 million dollars. The fact is that President Obama -- despite Republicans killing the climate change bill -- has done more in 18 months to change America's approach to the environment and green jobs than any president in memory.

    The fact is that if we are going to tackle the deficit, it makes no sense to cut taxes for people with plenty of money while we tell people who depend on Social Security and Medicare that they have to do with less, or to play games with unemployment insurance for those who need it most.

    Let me point out that:

    1. The Democrat Party won a major, major landslide in 2008 and immediately began governing as if it had barely won the election.

    2. The Democrat Party had few options available to it in January 2009, but drawing down our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, reforming the financial and banking sectors, bringing competent leaders to the Executive Branch, getting Americans back to work in real jobs not phony, temporary ones, and reducing the number of government contractors were options that weren't even on the table, but they should have been. The best way out of a bad economy is to find a way to create and sustain job growth while reducing unemployment. Tell me how a lobbyist-driven health care bill accomplished any of that.

    3. The Democrat Party has always been a bullied party of cowards, physical or moral and sometimes both.

    4. The Government shouldn't create jobs on a temporary basis because the results and the benefits don't sustain economic growth over the long term.

    5. Raising taxes is a sure sign that you don't want people to vote for you.

    Poor Howard Dean. He was the most effective voice of the Democrat Party when his part took control of the Congress and then the White House and all he has to show for it was the loss of his job, the damage to his professional reputation, and the cold shoulder of the man who wouldn't be President had it not been for the radical shift in strategy and organization that Dean put into place when the Democrat Party was on its ass.

    Sounds like American Politics 101 to me.

    Wednesday
    Jul282010

    Small Businesses Need Help Now

    I'm all for this:

    The small-business bill before the Senate would set up a $30 billion lending fund to help community banks offer small businesses credit. It also would provide tax breaks to small businesses that invest in new equipment and hire unemployed workers. The House passed a similar bill in June.

    Republican opposition has focused on the cost of the measure, but [President] Obama said Wednesday that the real reason is to obstruct progress for short-term political gain.

    "We've seen a fair amount of obstruction that's had more to do with gaining political advantage than helping the country," Obama said.

    The purpose of the small-business bill is to help entrepreneurs succeed, not prop them up, he said, adding: "Government can't guarantee success, but it can knock down barriers that keep entrepreneurs from opening or expanding."

    This is where a smart group of politicians would rally to the flag and shove the bill through Congress, effectively taking some credit for doing something in tough times. Small businesses need help and nothing will get American workers back on the job faster than a healthier climate for these companies to start growing and expanding.

    I like how this puts a pot of money out there for investment and how it rewards positive behavior. It's better than dumping cash into the hands of crooks (and if the crooks haven't already figured out how to get some of this money, I would be surprised). Let's get the engine running again. Let's see some innovation and investment and growth out there in the small business sector.

    Tuesday
    Jul272010

    David Brooks Reveals His Hippie Past, and No One Cares

    David Brooks is a fellow I have never bothered with. A lightweight and a fool when fools are plentiful. A man with a significant perch atop nothing. A hippie? That's a new one on me:

    I was a liberal Democrat when I was young. I used to wear a green Army jacket with political buttons on it — for Hubert Humphrey, Birch Bayh, John F. Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt. I even wore that jacket in my high school yearbook photo.

    It’s a magic green jacket. I can put it on today and, suddenly, my mind shifts back to the left. I start thinking like a Democrat, feeling a strange accompanying hunger for brown rice.

    When I put on that magic jacket today, I feel beleaguered but kind of satisfied. I feel beleaguered because the political winds are blowing so ferociously against “my” party. But I feel satisfied because the Democrats have overseen a bunch of programs that, while unappreciated now, are probably going to do a lot of good in the long run.

    For example, everybody now hates the bank bailouts and the stress tests. But, the fact is, these are some of the most successful programs in recent memory. They stabilized the financial system without costing much money. The auto bailout was criticized at the time, but it’s looking pretty good now that General Motors is recovering.

    But the magic jacket-wearing me is nervous about the next few years. I’m afraid my party is going to get stuck in the same old debates that we always lose. First, we’re going to have the same old tax debate. We’re going to not extend the Bush tax cuts on the rich. The Republicans will blast us for killing growth and raising taxes as they did in 2000 and 2004.

    What a jackass. No one--and I mean, no one--was ever hip to Hubert Humphrey. Even I can't buy that pantload of crap.

    What leaves me so suspect of Brooks is that he started out a liberal and became a conservative. This follows the standard arc of people who are intellectually deranged or simply damaged by life. If someone starts out a conservative and ends up a liberal, it means they are a guilt-ridden sex addict. If someone starts out as a conservative and stays a conservative, it means they are a saintly apparition from heaven. If someone starts out a liberal and stays a liberal, it means they are a tree-hugging hippie too damaged by drug abuse to understand basic human history.

    If you're like me, and if you started out a conservative, stayed a conservative, and then became an independent when John McCain destroyed the Republican Party in a fit of incompetent self-loathing, then you're someone I would like to know.

    David Brooks and his magic jacket should have been introduced to an editor who could shake his head no.

    Saturday
    Jul172010

    Screwing the Little People

    Harvest timeI must say, when liberals eat their own--they eat their own:

    We gave [Secretary of Education Arne Duncan] $4.3 billion in the stimulus package, no questions asked. He could spend it any way he wants. … I trusted the secretary, so I gave him a hell of a lot more money than I should have.

    My point is that I have been working for school reform long before I ever heard of the secretary of education, and long before I ever heard of Obama. And I’m happy to welcome them on the reform road, but I’ll be damned if I think the only road to reform lies in the head of the secretary of education.

    We were told we have to offset every damn dime of [new teacher spending]. Well, it ain’t easy to find offsets, and with all due respect to the administration their first suggestion for offsets was to cut food stamps. Now they were careful not to make an official budget request, because they didn’t want to take the political heat for it, but that was the first trial balloon they sent down here. …Their line of argument was, well, the cost of food relative to what we thought it would be has come down, so people on food stamps are getting a pretty good deal in comparison to what we thought they were going to get. Well isn’t that nice. Some poor bastard is going to get a break for a change.

    Is there any reason one should feel sorry for the Obama Administration right now?

    To suggest that, at a time when millions are without work while the economy is stagnated and threatening to slip back and roll over onto the tender toes of what few gains have been made. that we should cut food stamps is pathetic. I would expect a Republican President to tell the truth--Fatass Nation, you should learn to grow some garden vegetables and cut back on the salt and the red meat you're buying with those food stamps. I don't expect that coming from a liberal administration.

    Never let them tell you otherwise--President Bush's third term has been gangbusters for those of us with money.

    Wednesday
    Jul142010

    Never Expose Congress to Reality

    The White House, July 2009, as photographed by Norman RogersThe role of the White House is to be the partner of the Congress when your party is in charge of the House and the Senate, not the sniping teller of truths:

    This week, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs learned this important -- and unfortunate -- lesson: In politics, telling the truth can get you in trouble.

    On "Meet the Press" this past Sunday, Gibbs acknowledged what nearly every political analyst has concluded: that the U.S. House is in play come November.

    “I think there's no doubt there are enough seats in play that could cause Republicans to gain control," Gibbs said. "This will depend on strong campaigns by Democrats. And again, I think we've got to take the issues to them.”

    That comment from Gibbs -- plus all the attention it received -- made House SpeakerNancy Pelosi furious. "How could [Gibbs] know what is going on in our districts?" Pelosi told her members Tuesday, per Politico. "Some may weigh his words more than others. We have made our disagreement known to the White House."

    In other words, pointing out that Nancy Pelosi is doomed really won't move the agenda forward, unless that's what the White House actually wants.

    If it does, then get ready for the impeachment hearings. Abuse of power, anyone? Ginned up outrage, yes? Oh, and would you like some Chairman Issa to go with that?

    And, by the way, doesn't my photo still look fabulous? I remember that day. It was as hot as anything you've ever experienced, and I couldn't understand why I was standing outside the White House in the middle of summer. It must have been a very silly day for me. I think we were all mugged that night. I know we rode out of town on three good wheels and a donut tire, lucky to have our shirts.

    Monday
    Jul122010

    Do You Remember When Cindy Sheehan Was the Darling of the Left?

    U.S. Troops on patrol in IraqAnd do you remember when, just by camping outside of the ranch owned by George W. Bush in Crawford, Texas, Cindy Sheehan became a celebrity?

    Or have we all just forgotten?

    The trial for activist Cindy Sheehan over her arrest earlier this year is scheduled to begin in D.C. Superior Court.

    Sheehan was among eight anti-war protesters arrested March 20 after laying coffins at a White House fence. She was charged with crossing a police line.

    Her bench trial is set to begin Monday morning. Judge Robert E. Morin will decide the case.

    Sheehan, whose son was killed in Iraq in April 2004, staged a prolonged demonstration in 2005 outside then-President George W. Bush's ranch near Crawford, Texas.

    I haven't forgotten. Where's the new Cindy Sheehan, out there ruining the summer vacation of this President? Do you really think that someone could get away with that now? It's so old-hat, being a grieving mother with a dead child and two wars running at the same time while Benjamin Netanyahu comes to Washington to bum-rush the American establishment into a third war.

    The worst thing one can do is to stop being useful to a group or an ideological alignment in American politics. Being cast aside is painful. Being run over like a dog is par for the course. Being on the receiving end of love one day and scorn the next is like nothing else on Earth.