An American Lion
Powered by Squarespace

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Rampage of the Innocents - My Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

Tags

 

Categories

An American Lion

The Monthly Archives

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system.

An American Lion

Talking Smack About Sports

The Things I Do

I’m a Mommy Blogger

The Admiral Hassenpfeffer

Rachel Ray’s Magnificent Ass

Ghost Ride The Whip

I Love My Guns More Than My Children

The Republican Party

Safe For Work Hotties

Money

BlogWithIntegrity.com _______________________

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Twingly BlogRank

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

Subscribe in Bloglines

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to netvibes

blogarama - the blog directory

TAMAZU: About Me Blogs

add page

http://www.wikio.com

http://www.wikio.com/

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Entries in Crime (180)

    Saturday
    13Mar2010

    Johnny Law is Running Amok in Rapid City, South Dakota

    This is a great case for the United States Supreme Court

    I can proudly point to a lifetime of success and excitement because I have never, ever been to South Dakota.

    Friends tell me the place is a canker sore on the ass end of the indecent part of the country. I have been to Minnesota, of course. Who hasn’t been to Minnesota? They have things to do there. South Dakota? Please. The only thing to do in South Dakota is to stare desperately at the end of your grasp on sanity as it seeps out the end of what was your beautiful soul after you’ve been driven batshit crazy by the boredom.

    Another wonderful thing about never having been there is when you come across a story like this when you’re looking for news about how tough it is to find qualified mechanics and technical people in the military:

    Jene Newsome played by the rules as an Air Force sergeant: She never told anyone in the military she was a lesbian.

    The 28-year-old’s honorable discharge under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy came only after police officers in Rapid City, S.D., saw an Iowa marriage certificate in her home and told the nearby Ellsworth Air Force Base.

    Newsome and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a complaint against the western South Dakota police department, claiming the officers violated her privacy when they informed the military about her sexual orientation. The case also highlights concerns over the ability of third parties to “out” service members, especially as the Pentagon has started reviewing the 1993 “don’t ask, don’t tell” law.

    Newsome says in the article that she respected and lived by the DADT regulations. That right there should tell you one thing: this person respects the military and isn’t looking for attention because her feelings are hurt or because she wants attention and a book deal and a chance to meet people who relish the chance to bash the military. From what I gather here, we have a genuine case of someone respecting good order and discipline. This isn’t the all-too-familiar story of a fresh young recruit plastered with glitter and goo who got caught having same-sex partners in the middle of an Ecstasy-fueled hump-fest at a dance club two weeks away from graduating from airborne school. This was a career-oriented professional who has been trained and educated to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and all of that was flushed down the toilet because Johnny Law felt like it.

    Who is this young lady?

    The Rapid City Police Department says Newsome, an aircraft armament system craftsman who spent nine years in the Air Force, was not cooperative when they showed up at her home in November with an arrest warrant for her partner, who was wanted on theft charges in Fairbanks, Alaska.

    Newsome was at work at the base at the time and refused to immediately come home and assist the officers in finding her partner, whom she married in Iowa — where gay marriage is legal — in October.

    Police officers, who said they spotted the marriage license on the kitchen table through a window of Newsome’s home, alerted the base, police Chief Steve Allender said in a statement sent to the AP. The license was relevant to the investigation because it showed both the relationship and residency of the two women, he said.

    “It’s an emotional issue and it’s unfortunate that Newsome lost her job, but I disagree with the notion that our department might be expected to ignore the license, or not document the license, or withhold it from the Air Force once we did know about it,” Allender said Saturday. “It was a part of the case, part of the report and the Air Force was privileged to the information.”

    Let’s just stop and puncture Johnny Law’s little statement with this one salient fact: Newsome was at work at the base at the time. This is a woman in the military who straps missiles and armaments onto an aircraft and ensures that these systems operate properly. She is a non-commissioned officer, and that means that she probably supervises, trains, and inspects the work of the airmen who work for her. She’s not a pencil pusher or a chair wrangler or a dog walker. She helps the pilots with the stuff that goes boom, sir. What, is she supposed to stop everything and come running when Johnny Law peeks through her windows?

    Police officers, who said they spotted the marriage license on the kitchen table through a window of Newsome’s home, alerted the base, police Chief Steve Allender said in a statement sent to the AP. The license was relevant to the investigation because it showed both the relationship and residency of the two women, he said.

    I’m highlighting that again because of how weird it reads to me. So what if her partner has a warrant for theft? A warrant is one thing; that’s between Johnny Law and that particular individual. It’s not for a violent crime and it’s a procedural thing. It’s not life or death, and it’s a basic and very understandable invasion of privacy to pursue said warrant to the point where Johnny Law is looking in a window and reading off the marriage license of two people legally married in Iowa. Hey, here’s an idea—let’s give the Johnny Laws in Rapid City a dozen or so drone aircraft so they can scour the city, looking sideways into windows onto kitchen tables, so that they can spot people who fail to pay their parking tickets.

    Whose business is that, Johnny Law? Yes, you have the right home. You have a warrant in hand. You’re looking in the windows. Do you have the person you’re looking for? No? Does one spouse have to bend over backwards, leave the flight line, and hurry home so you can throw the other spouse in jail over some theft charges that are pending in another state? No.

    Then, I guess, you’re done here, Johnny Law.

    I hope this case goes all the way to the top, and I hope they take the wind out of little Johnny Law’s sails there in Rapid City. I shall laugh my fanny off when this young lady walks away with a big check and an appropriate apology.

    Friday
    12Mar2010

    Next Time You Look Up, Will You See a Drone Overhead?

    Predator

    I realize we sold our privacy rights down the river so that politicians could feel better about doing nothing to protect us, but I didn’t know we would reach this point. The point where the revelation that drones are flying over American citizens on a regular basis, trying to catch criminals and whatnot, would be met with indifference. I can predict the indifference. I can tell you, without hesitation, that the media won’t explain this and the American people won’t be told why this is not such a great idea and how it can lead to abuses of power. Is there anyone who will sit down and explain to you that the reason why we don’t let the cops listen to every phone call being made in the country is because, if they did, everyone in America would be in jail, including, of course, 99% of the cops?

    When you apply technology to law enforcement, you cannot apply a level of technology greater than the need to stop only the most reprehensible of crimes. You have to have a threshold where technology cannot become overkill. Yes, the police would like to have helicopter gunships. Do they get helicopter gunships to help them solve problems with high speed chases and grannies with canes who run amok through miniature golf courses? No, they don’t. This is because, once you give Johnny Law a helicopter gunship and tell him to solve his problems with it, you end up with Johnny Law using a helicopter gunship to shut down illegal lemonade stands. Human beings naturally abuse their power; when you have limited government, you throw a monkey wrench into that whole sort of thing. And, for good reason. Helicopter gunships really aren’t good for anything, other than shooting and killing vast numbers of people. And, do we really want that in our back yards? Let’s hope that answer stays “no” until I finally pass away out of this crazy world.

    Do you think it’s an accident that this sort of thing comes out just as American Idol kicks into high gear?

    It’s a frigid, dark night in the mountainous border region of southeast Arizona. A group of 31 suspected illegal immigrants are walking up and down rocky ridges toward Tucson, Arizona. They’re wearing small backpacks and stop to rest every few minutes.

    This isn’t a scene unfolding before the eyes of Border Patrol agents on the ground. It comes from a video image provided by a Predator B unmanned aircraft 19,000 feet overhead. In fact, the nearest Border Patrol agents are far away.

    Jerry Kersey is the Customs and Border Protection agent in charge of this night’s Predator mission. He and his two-man crew relay the information to Border Patrol agents from a small trailer 40 miles from the scene.

    Kersey directs the agents on the ground, who are wearing night-vision goggles.

    “Stop! Stop! They’re to your right,” Kersey firmly dictates over a radio transmission. “They must see you. The group is running.”

    Is this really where we want to go as a society and as a country? Are we really comfortable handing over such over-the-top technology to the border patrol?

    You might very well agree with the idea of using drones in this manner; well, why not use them to catch speeders, then? Why not use them to catch jaywalkers and punks with spraypaint cans? Why not fly one over every home in America just to make sure everyone is doing what they’re supposed to do, and make it so that it can peek through walls so that we’re all comfortable with what’s going on inside?

    Once you let them do what they will, getting that genie back in the bottle becomes a little more difficult. Once you give your consent to being tracked, searched, recorded, databased, datamined and retained for all eternity, you don’t get that back. You cannot say “stop!” and you cannot make the case that they’ve “gone too far” because, we, as a nation, crossed that threshold years ago.

    Believe me when I tell you this—you don’t know how valuable your privacy is until you no longer have it.

    Monday
    08Mar2010

    The Great Caravan Crime Wave

    Caravan

    I don’t know that I’ve ever been in a caravan. In Great Britain, a caravan is a camper. In America, a camper is what an older version of Joe Six Pack uses to make it worthwhile to go camping. I think the idea behind a caravan is quaint—nature, in all of its glory, is best enjoyed in a miniature version of a cheap apartment on wheels. Do you know what’s really fun? Getting two hotel rooms and switching from one to the other just because you can, and wasting a night, which you can then write off on your taxes. Oh, now that’s a good time had by me.

    Anyway, the Brits had a crime wave caper that came to a screeching halt when the scallywags were caught by the combined efforts of nineteen different police agencies:

    A gang of travellers who stole hundreds of caravans worth more than £700,000 have been jailed.

    The four men, who were based in Wiltshire, are thought to be responsible for half the country’s caravan thefts between 2004 and 2007.

    Charlie Ward, 28, Martin Ward, 21, John McDonagh, 31, and Martin McDonagh, 29, were jailed for between four and nine years at Winchester Crown Court.

    The insurance industry reported a 47% drop in claims following their arrest.

    The men were found in possession of stolen caravans, cars and motor homes, jewellery and cash when they were arrested in Chiseldon in October 2007.

    Just think what will happen when they catch the other gang. Oh my, that was obvious, wasn’t it? My bad, sir.

    Sunday
    07Mar2010

    The Irish Turn Away From the Catholic Church

    While I don’t have a problem with religion, I certainly prefer secular societies that know the proper place of religion in their politics and culture. Ireland seems to be reaching that point as well, and, just so you know, the proper place to me is separate and distant. Your government should never be religious-based, and your religion should never be based on taking control of the government.

    The overwhelming influence of the Catholic Church in Ireland is well known; seeing Irish priests kiss the ring of the Pope shouldn’t elicit anything other than delight in the faithful. In point of fact, the opposite has happened—many Irish citizens are angry that the current Pope has done nothing to help address the sexual abuse crimes committed by members of the church:

    Andrew Madden, the first person in Ireland to go public about his abuse by a priest, described the meetings at the Vatican as “a complete waste of time” and the greatest act of window dressing he had ever seen. Abuse survivor Marie Collins saidit was an insult that the resignation of bishops didn’t even make the agenda. Additionally, she said it was deplorable that the pope’s statement was “so far away from accepting that there was a policy of coverup.”

    Of course, it’s not unusual for bishops to kiss the pope’s ring, and the Vatican has always been heavily male and ornate. The difference now is that Irish Catholics, after decades of alienation from the church, are finally nearing a breaking point.

    Not so very long ago and for the great majority of Irish people, their Catholicism was synonymous with their national identity. To be Irish was to be Catholic. It was something of which most Irish were very proud.

    In the latter part of the 19th century, the church grew to become the most powerful civic institution on the island, controlling most of Ireland’s schools and the greater number of its hospitals.

    This allowed the church unparalleled influence throughout most of the 20th century in what is now known as the Republic of Ireland. That continued to be the case until the latter decades of the last century when its influence began to wane due to increased affluence and a better-educated population. With the events of the last few years, church leaders can no longer ignore the extent to which they’ve lost control of Irish society.

    In this way, the scandal doesn’t really mirror what happened in the United States. Going back at least twenty years, legal cases have been brought against the church in the United States. Accountability has had a long, tough road in the United States but, at the very least, many victims have had a chance to appear in court and see their abusers punished. The church has withdrawn priests and hid them; in Ireland, they simply refuse to acknowledge the crimes.

    This has to figure into how the church approaches the issue of priest sex abuse. In a country where there is a highly developed legal system or a small number of practicing faithful, the chances of the criminal code being applied to the church and then issuing a severe punishment is fairly high. In Ireland, the church is very closely tied to the government and the culture. Not only does this account for a lack of accountability, it also accounts for the possibility that the problem will never be solved or dealt with. That means more victims, more coverups, and more obstruction.

    Friday
    05Mar2010

    You See, the Entire Internet Is Just a Scam and a Fraud

    Put this down as another example as to why you cannot trust anything online:

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) last week screamed “the Emperor has no clothes” by reporting to consumers that one of the largest firms issuing “Verified Secure Breach Protection” seals doesn’t really verify much at all. The practical impact of the ruling for E-Commerce sites is unclear, both because the FTC has little authority to enforce its rulings and because consumers have typically been impressively apathetic about security and privacy issues.

    The settlement against five-year-old ControlScan said that “contrary to the statements” ControlScan made to retailers, the company “in many instances conducted little or no verification of the privacy and/or security protections for consumer information provided by companies displaying its Business Background Reviewed, Registered Member, Privacy Protected and Privacy Reviewed seals. Instead, in many instances, ControlScan provided the Registered Member seal to a company that failed to qualify for the Verified Secure seal because an electronic scan of its Web site identified an actual or potential severe vulnerability on the Web site and permitted the company to display the seal indefinitely while taking no action to assess whether the company was working to resolve any vulnerability identified by the Web site scan.”

    That last charge is particularly significant because it moves these accusations beyond mere neglect (they never bothered to check) to true, all-American lying (they checked, found bad stuff and gave them the seal anyway, as long as they paid their bill).

    But there were also accusations-in this settlement that ControlScan has now agreed to-of neglect. The filing said that ControlScan “provided the Privacy Protected seal to a company that posted a privacy policy on its Web site, with no review of the company’s underlying privacy or information security practices and provided the Privacy Reviewed seal to a company that failed to qualify for the Privacy Protected seal because it failed to post a privacy policy on its Web site.”

    Nothing bothers me more than when people lie about who they are and what they’re about in order to get something from the Internet. God, I do hate and condemn such things.

    Friday
    26Feb2010

    And I Thought I Was a Terrible Parent

    I won’t go into all of the awful things that I did as a parent—up to and including taking my three boys to Metallica concerts and paying roadies to beat up anyone who wouldn’t sit down in front of us so we could see them set up Lars’ drum kit—but at least I’m not this bag of nuts:

    Police said the mother of an elementary school student drank a 40 ounce bottle of malt liquor before brandishing a sword in her child’s school. The woman, 32, apparently intended to confront the parents of another child who had been in a spitting match with her child the previous day.

    According to court records, an employee at Riverview Elementary School in Memphis reported a drunk woman armed with a sword was running through the halls of the school and had threatened to cut her.

    Officers who arrived on the scene retrieved a black cane that concealed the blade.

    The woman charged with aggravated assault and having a weapon on school property.

    Can I live where she lives? That has to be the cutting edge of a new dawn in American culture—a dawn where anything goes, even spitting matches.

    What happened to the Chess Club? This used to be a geeky country. Now, it’s a drunken lout of a country, making use of the swords that the geeks thought were bitchen. And what’s with all of the sword attacks? Is this because you can go into specialty stores in cheap malls and buy knockoff swords made out of tin? Are we going to see a nationwide ban on swords perpetrated by some well-intentioned scold now?