An American Lion

This is where Norman Rogers practices the manly art of curation.

Custom Search

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system. The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton seduced the women of the town and solved crimes, all while subsisting on a steady diet of depravity and confusion.

Rampage of the Innocents is my unfinished but brilliant Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

  Archives

Categories

drupal statistics module

PageRank Checker

TopOfBlogs

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

BlogRankers.com

Blogs lists and reviews

 

blogarama - the blog directory

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

add page

http://www.wikio.com

Seed Newsvine

http://www.wikio.com/

Powered by Squarespace
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    An American Lion

    Entries in Books (20)

    Wednesday
    Jul282010

    The Bitterest Cup of All

    "A Bitter Cup of Coffee" by Doug GladstoneI recently received an E-mail about the injustice done to a vast number of Major League Baseball players who played before 1980. By arbitrarily selecting a questionable metric, over 800 players were eliminated from receiving a pension or health care benefits.

    Now, I know what you're thinking--how could this E-mail have been anything other than a request to help Prince Akamabooboo transfer some cash from Pomerania to Illyria so that his dead father, who was murdered by the dastardly finance minister of Togo, could be avenged? When people send me E-mails, I often hear about how Peej has deleted them. I don't go through them myself. Mr. Peej is my gatekeeper. I get a lot of hate mail. A lot. Mother Bear, stop sending me pictures of your you-know-what. And all of you college boys? I'm not the one who called the Dean on your sorry asses.

    The E-mail that I received from a Mr. Doug Gladstone went into the do something now pile because we're all baseball fans in this home.

    Anyway, here's a better summation of what Mr. Gladstone's book is all about:

    A Bitter Cup of Coffee tells the story of a group of former big-league ballplayers denied pensions as a result of the failure of both the league and the union to retroactively amend the vesting requirement change that granted instant pension eligibility to ballplayers in 1980. Prior to that year, ballplayers had to have four years service credit to earn an annuity and medical benefits. Since 1980, however, all they have needed is one day of service credit for health insurance and 43 days of service credit for a pension. Talk about a sweetheart deal!

    As Dave notes, "Fixing this inadvertent injustice can be done, if both the owners and the players decide to do it. It will cost them marginal money to do so. They say they’ll look at it in their next 2011 (collective bargaining ) negotiation, but they should stop looking and start acting now. A simple side agreement could be executed anytime.

    I doubt that it will ever get fixed. The current commissioner of baseball, Mr. Bud Selig, is inherently corrupt and incapable of doing the right thing. If doing the right thing were his own ass, he couldn't find it with both hands. Probably a lovely man. Probably kisses babies and hugs ugly women and goes to church. Who knows? But a leader he ain't.

    Out there, all across the land, there are players who are not getting their due. This is some serious bitterness:

    “My memories, my experiences, I’d never trade anything in the world for them,” said Steve Grilli. However, as priceless as his memories are to him, Grilli is still steamed that he’s not getting a pension. “I paid union dues when I played, and now we’re told that the union doesn’t owe us representation,” he fumed. “I’m a victim of circumstance, all because three decades ago either somebody forgot to write us into that collective bargaining agreement or they didn’t want to write us into the contract at all.

    “I feel like I’m just being swept under the carpet,” Grilli continues. “You know, I didn’t make a whole lot of money when I was playing, my first contract in the big leagues was for only $16,500, and that’s because I played in an era when the pendulum was swung in favor of the owners.” Money was so tight that Grilli says he used to siphon off gas from a used car lot just to avoid having to fill up at the pump.

    It's not all superstar contracts and bags of money, and it never has been. When I was graduating from Princeton, invariably, there would be talk about "professional football" and what it meant to us. For students at schools in the Midwest, it meant a chance to continue playing the sport if all they had to look forward to was the Army or working in a granary or making poor people make widgets in a tumbledown factory.

    For those of us graduating from Ivy League schools, it was a chance to go broke in a few years trying to make ends meet on the heavily-taxed proceeds from a paltry professional sports contract. Let's remember that taxes in the 1940s and 1950s were exceptionally high, and even these relatively reasonable sports contracts weren't really worth much. So if you hear that a player made $20,000 a year back in the day, remember: that player paid one heck of a lot of taxes on their income. If a player made huge money, they could expect to pay most of their salary to the government in taxes.

    I had a chance to go to work for Father, and make good money. I didn't have an offer to play defense for the New York Giants, but if I had been given that chance, the money wouldn't have been half of what Father was promising to pay me, and it still would have been taxed at a very high rate. I want to say 70% of the income would have been confiscated for taxes. Sound right?

    In the old days, you didn't get rich playing sports unless you were iconic and unbelievable. You might have done alright, but if you had a chance to go into business, that's where you went. I played against and alongside a number of very good players who would have scoffed at what they were paying the position players for a team like the Baltimore Colts.

    Anyway, Doug Gladstone has compiled a wonderful series of interviews and facts together to make a book that should shame baseball and cause someone to move quickly to fix this oversight. Knowing what I know about Mr. Selig and the sport, I'm sorry but these players have a better chance of winning the Nigerian lottery via E-mail.

    Friday
    May072010

    Should a Library Be Allowed to Filter Internet Content?

    My opinion is, no. A library should not get into the business of filtering Internet content. A library should be able to filter our hardcore pornography and copyrighted material, like films or music, but content? No.

    The Washington State Supreme Court disagrees with me, and they have issued a ruling on this subject. Here, in part, is the story on that:

    According to an article in Library Journal, the decision is the first of its kind and "may lead some libraries to adopt more stringent Internet filtering policies."

    The disturbing part of this decision lies in the fact that more than 75 million people rely on the library for Internet access and, as a report by the University of Washington pointed out last March, the public library has become "a critical digital hub".

    The decision answers the question of "Whether a public library [...] may filter Internet access for all patrons without disabling the filter to allow access to Web sites containing constitutionally-protected speech upon the request of an adult library patron." Of the 9 judges issuing the opinion, only three offered a dissent.

    "The plaintiffs' claims of overbreadth, prior restraint, and that NCRL's Internet filtering policy is an impermissible content-based restriction all fail to account for this traditional and long-standing discretion to select what materials will be included in a public library's collection," the court writes in its opinion.

    Well, there's a critical flaw in this thinking: the Internet is not in the collection of the public library; it's an external repository of available information. Those of us who used the Internet in the old, old days can tell you this categorically--the information on the Internet resides on servers, and those servers could be in a library somewhere, but, more likely, those servers are in an IT department. The Internet was, and I'm making this up because it's fun, originally just a way for people at one university to share information with people at another university. You can dissent on that, if you choose. I suspect that if you do, you'll reveal the fact that you spent your days at college studying crap. Hope that degree is working for you, sir.

    Anyway, the article continues:

    According to those judges agreeing with the opinion, "The reason is simple: in determining the makeup of their collections, public libraries have limited resources, including computers; some libraries in this case have only one or two. Public libraries may determine -- by filter -- among the vast sea of educational and informational materials which materials are appropriate for the libraries' collections. "

    The dissenting opinion acknowledges that "the vast majority of what the censor catches is low value speech" but that "The filter should be removed on the request of an adult patron. Concerns that a child might see something unfortunate on the screen must be dealt with in a less draconian manner."

    I don't want libraries to cater to the porn needs of weirdos. They shouldn't have to. But, when we start to consider what is "appropriate" for a library, well, goodbye Norman Mailer and goodbye Judy Blume, and whoever else has something to say. This will allow a committee of bluehairs to ban everything, even books, for crying out loud, and we cannot have that.

    I mean, no one has ever heard of a library banning books have they? Because that's un-American, isn't it?

    Saturday
    Apr172010

    What's This Nonsense?

    Someone having a bit of fun?

    An Australian publisher has had to pulp and reprint a cook-book after one recipe listed "salt and freshly ground black people" instead of black pepper.

    Penguin Group Australia had to reprint 7,000 copies of Pasta Bible last week, the Sydney Morning Herald has reported.

    The reprint cost A$20,000 ($18,000; £12,000), but stock in bookshops will not be recalled as it is "extremely hard" to do so, Penguin said.

    The recipe was for spelt tagliatelle with sardines and prosciutto.

    "We're mortified that this has become an issue of any kind, and why anyone would be offended, we don't know," head of publishing Bob Sessions is quoted as saying by the Sydney newspaper.

    Penguin said almost every one of the more than 150 recipes in the book listed salt and freshly ground black pepper, but a misprint occurred on just one page.

    That's the problem, though, with spell check. Something like that can pass just about any spell check program, but logic check programs aren't good enough (or widespread enough) to save a publisher.

    It would seem to me that a book publisher ought to have a "logic" program that ferrets out these errors and checks against cheeky little jokes that are inserted into a publication before it gets printed. Something like that might pay for itself in the long run. People? People are obviously just not reliable enough, I guess. I don't know. I wish I had someone cleaning up my mistakes. Mr. Peej tries, but sometimes he lets a few slip by, such as the post we've been trying to write for three days about Miranda's "Little Mermaid" birthday party.

    I shall try to get that post sorted out sometime today. It's kept us up nights. Three lawyers have been brought in. There are sixteen different versions of it. Miranda approves of none of this, of course.

    Thursday
    Feb042010

    Tenure Means That Dead Wood Can Avoid Teaching Forever

    Am I reading this wrong? I don’t think I am:

    The leader of the country’s largest university thinks it’s time to re-examine how professors are awarded tenure, a type of job-for-life protection virtually unknown outside academia.

    Ohio State University President Gordon Gee says the traditional formula that rewards publishing in scholarly journals over excellence in teaching and other contributions is outdated and too often favors the quantity of a professor’s output over quality.

    “Someone should gain recognition at the university for writing the great American novel or for discovering the cure for cancer,” he told The Associated Press. “In a very complex world, you can no longer expect everyone to be great at everything.”

    Plenty of people have raised the issue over the years, but Gee is one of the few American college presidents with the reputation and political prowess — not to mention the golden touch at fundraising — who might be able to begin the transformation.

    It’s not about who is good at teaching; it’s more a case of who is able to bring a certain level of prominence to the academic institution. If you go on to read the article, one professor cannot expect tenure unless she publishes a certain book. That’s fine—but is she any good at her job?

    How do you evaluate that? At Princeton, here’s how I evaluated my professors: if Peej, who went to classes for me, thought they were fools, then they were fools. Peej probably knows more about education than I’ll ever know. And that’s a good thing. You don’t want someone as frisky as me trying to stay focused in a classroom. I tend to wander off. You don’t want me deciding who gets tenure. I do everything based on class and looks.

    Friday
    Jan292010

    Is Someone Trying to Make a Point?

    This seems like a rather ill-timed book excerpt from Bush speech writer Marc Thiessen:

    In mid-2004, then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi learned something from a CIA briefing that made her blood boil. Pelosi reportedly “came unglued” at the revelation and had “strong words” with national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, demanding that the CIA abandon its plans. As a result, a top-secret finding that President George W. Bush signed to authorize the CIA’s activities was revised. Pelosi succeeded in stopping the agency from moving forward with the controversial operation.

    Please note that word “reportedly.”

    “Reportedly” means that this likely didn’t happen. We’d have known about it by now, or this would already be known, or it would be part of the public record. Thiessen’s book is supposed to break new ground in this regard? Really? A Bush speech writer has access to that level of information? Or does a Bush speech writer really have an agenda to pursue on the backs of hearsay? 

    I won’t defend Pelosi; I will simply note that this same technique of making an easy-to-dismiss allegation has been used in recent years against virtually everyone, and not just the people trying to market and sell a book that trades on the fear of terrorism. I would proceed with a healthy dose of skepticism, since what you’re about to read is fairly self-serving for someone who wants to get rid of Pelosi and become the chief of the Republican book writers:

    What drove Pelosi to action? Not the CIA’s waterboarding of suspected al-Qaeda terrorists. In a 2009 interview, a former senior Bush administration official directed me to a little-noticed item from Time magazine. According to this 2004 report, Pelosi objected to a CIA plan to provide money to moderate political parties in Iraq ahead of scheduled elections, in an effort to counter Iran, which was funneling millions to extremist elements. “House minority leader Nancy Pelosi ‘came unglued’ when she learned about what a source described as a plan for ‘the CIA to put an operation in place to affect the outcome of the elections,’ ” Time reported. “Pelosi had strong words with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice in a phone call about the issue… . A senior U.S. official hinted that, under pressure from the Hill, the Administration scaled back its original plans.” (Her role was also reported on this page by David Ignatius in 2007.)

    Why is this important? Because on May 14, 2009, Pelosi, now speaker of the House, declared in a Capitol Hill news conferencethat she had opposed CIA waterboarding but was powerless to stop it. A former senior intelligence official told me in 2009 that he was shocked by Pelosi’s claim because, he said, “Speaker Pelosi herself has stopped covert action programs that she has been briefed on by going to the White House. In that very same time frame [after she learned about waterboarding] Pelosi had gone back to the White House [over] a separate covert action program, expressed strong opposition to it. And the remarkable part to me, the White House backed off the program, changed one aspect of the program … she was particularly opposed to. And literally, the finding was pulled back and revised.” If Pelosi had truly opposed waterboarding, he said, she had numerous ways to stop it — but she didn’t try.

    “She didn’t try.”

    Is that the allegation? Then why didn’t this come out and thus destroy Pelosi when waterboarding was riding high in the news media?

    Oh, hold on:

    At the time of her press briefing, Pelosi had been forced to acknowledge that she had learned in February 2003 that waterboarding was being used. Why, reporters asked, did she not object? Flustered, Pelosi claimed that it was not her place to complain because she was no longer the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee. “A letter raising concerns was sent to CIA general counsel Scott Muller by the new Democratic ranking member of [the] committee [Jane Harman], the appropriate person to register a protest.” She made this claim five times during the briefing.

    In fact, Harman’s letter, since declassified, did not “register a protest”; it asked “what kind of policy review took place” and urged the agency not to destroy interrogation tapes. Moreover, when Pelosi made this claim, she knew that in 2004, when she was no longer the committee’s ranking member, she had personally intervened with the White House to stop different covert action. She did not defer to Harman; she herself took action. Why was it “appropriate” for her to intervene then but not in the case of waterboarding?

    Pelosi was asked by a reporter, “Do you wish now that you had done more? Do you wish it had been your own letter?” Pelosi replied, “No, no, no, no, no, no … No letter or anything else is going to stop them from doing what they’re going to do.” She made this claim three times during the briefing. All the while knowing that her phone call to Rice in 2004 had stopped the CIA from “doing what they were going to do” in a different covert operation.

    Do you get the sense that Thiessen knows which way the wind is now blowing?

    If he really cared about torture, or waterboarding, or the complicity of the Bush Administration and Congress in said matters, this would not be your first exposure to the notion of “she didn’t try” as it relates to the other details in the case. However, the public has been exposed to this, and has rejected it as an avenue of attack. Mr. Thiessen’s publishers paid money for old, rehashed news. How, exactly, is this supposed to tarnish President Obama, who is well on his way to talking himself out of a job?

    Pelosi has been smeared many times, as were her several predecessors. This sort of thing is done to Republicans and Democrats and it is nothing new. Can you spot it? Can you detect it when it happens and look at it objectively? Nancy Pelosi is no one I would ever vote for, but when your uncle Norman’s bullshit detector goes off, I tend to look past ideology and look at the motive and the thin sourcing of the information.

    Thursday
    Dec312009

    Thank Goodness for This One Positive Development

    The Baby-Sitters Club Book Number 8 (a classic)

    I just got off the phone with Miranda, and she seems nonplussed by this news. Too bad. I am ecstatic:

    Ann. M. Martin (New York Times)Taking a page from Broadway and George Lucas, Scholastic Inc., the children’s book publisher, is trying for a revival — with a prequel attached.

    In April the company plans to reissue repackaged and slightly revised versions of the first two volumes in one of its most successful series, “The Baby-Sitters Club,” in the hopes of igniting enthusiasm in a new generation of readers. And just as Mr. Lucas brought “Star Wars” back with a whole new arc of stories that began before the original series, Scholastic is publishing a newly written prequel, “The Summer Before,” by Ann M. Martin, the original author of “The Baby-Sitters Club” books.

    The move follows Scholastic’s 2008 resuscitation of “Goosebumps,” another of its most popular series. For now Scholastic and Ms. Martin only have plans for the one prequel, although the publisher will release three more reissues of the original series later next year.

    “The Baby-Sitters Club,” which ran from 1986 through 2000, garnered an ardent following among preteenage girls throughout its run of 213 titles, with the publisher ultimately printing 176 million copies. The series, which followed the baby-sitting adventures and friendships of four 12-to-13-year-old girls — Kristy, Mary Anne, Claudia and Stacey (the cast expanded to eight main characters later in the series) — spawned several spinoffs, including a mystery series and a collection of books about Kristy’s little sister. All of the books are now out of print.

    David Levithan, the editorial director at Scholastic and an editor of “The Baby-Sitters Club,” said the publisher decided to bring back the old series because of requests from fans who wanted a comeback.

    “This whole generation of girls who had grown up reading ‘The Baby-Sitters Club’ were now teachers, librarians or mothers,” Mr. Levithan said. “And at any opportunity they had, they let us know they wanted them back. We couldn’t go to a convention without having women come up to us and say, ‘You’ve got to bring these books back.’ ”

    Hear, hear.

    I read these books to Miranda when she was just a pup, and I tend to internalize what I read. I am not a snob. I appreciate a good story, and, brother, if you think the Baby-Sitters Club didn’t have heartache, suspense, longing, and character development in spades, you don’t know what you’re talking about. Being a voracious reader, I have this period locked into what I call my reading memory. We would pick these books up at the B. Dalton store at the mall—I do miss B. Dalton. It was the perfect little store. Books by the shelf, not the acre, and no bag ladies sleeping in the aisles. Bag ladies, the book store is not your personal library. Drink your cheap coffee and get out. Hippies, this means you, too.

    If you think this wasn’t a series with inherent tension and drama, think again:

    Mary Anne was the first club member to have a steady boyfriend, Logan Bruno, who becomes an associate member of the club. They break up for a while in book #41, Mary Anne versus Logan but get back together later in the series. She gets in trouble over him in book #79, Mary Anne Breaks the Rules, when she invites Logan over during a sitting job and is caught. She and Logan break up permanently in Mary Anne’s Big Breakup due to incompatible differences and Logan’s possessiveness. Mary Anne is heartbroken.

    I thought “Goosebumps” was a lame series, and Miranda agreed. Kids don’t do horror. Kids are the horror. And you can quote me on that.

    We read these Baby-Sitters Club books until she was about nineteen or so. I read them to her over the phone when she was at U-Mass. She put me on speaker phone and I would read the books to her entire floor when she was in the Freshman dorms. Those ladies were polite, and the nostalgia, for them, made more than a few break down in tears.

    Tuesday
    Dec222009

    This Doesn't Shock Me

    Tera Patrick

    Adult film actress Tera Patrick has written a book about her experiences, but the release of this book is gaining some notoriety for what her ex-husband has to say about her:

    I hate to break it to him, and to the unsuspecting public, but adult film actresses have a visceral reaction to sex for money, and many do not enjoy it, nor are they able to deal adequately with the impact it has on their lives. For more information on this, see Jennie Ketcham’s blog, and read up on the subject.
    Patrick fires back here:
    Monday
    Dec072009

    Patricia Highsmith Reconsidered

    Scene from Strangers on a Train (1951)

    I have often wondered what they will say about me when I'm dead. I hope they say awful things. Nothing else would do.

    It's too bad that Patricia Highsmith isn't around to enjoy having terrible things said about her:

    "She was a horrible human being," recalls Otto Penzler, one of her publishers. It's an apt eulogy for a novelist whom Graham Greene, rather more charitably, dubbed "the poet of apprehension," a 20th century demiurge whose "world we enter each time with a sense of personal danger, with the head half turned over the shoulder." The first words of Joan Schenkar's splendid, sinewy new biography, "The Talented Miss Highsmith: The Secret Life and Serious Art of Patricia Highsmith," concede the point: "She wasn't nice," Schenkar admits; "She was rarely polite." Yet the "toxic brilliance of [her] trail goes on glowing" 15 years after her death in 1995 -- when "she drove a last, devoted visitor from her hospital room and then died unobserved."

    She, of course, is crime novelist Patricia Highsmith, born in Fort Worth, Texas, in 1921, later creator of Tom Ripley -- whose exploits, chronicled in the five-volume "Ripliad," have inspired numerous films, including Anthony Minghella's 1999 poisoned Venetian valentine "The Talented Mr. Ripley" -- and author of "Strangers on a Train," which Hitchcock adapted in 1951. Misanthropy seeped through her work like blood into terrazzo (one short-story collection even features homicidal pets exacting lethal vengeance on their masters); she hated Jews with rancid fervor; she "seemed to be the sole curator of a Museum of Twentieth-Century American maladies," suggests Schenkar.

    But throughout 22 novels and dozens of short stories (if not her improbable children's book, "Miranda the Panda Is on the Veranda"), Highsmith revolutionized the field of suspense fiction, perverting and inverting a genre once synonymous with moral education and civic virtue. Her output rebuked the essentially wholesome stories of Chandler and Hammett, in which detectives punish felons, restore order and admonish readers; "Nothing," Schenkar argues, "could have been more American" than the scenarios Highsmith fashioned in turn: "two men bound together psychologically by the stalker-like fixation of one upon the other."

    Greene noted that Highsmith's "characters are irrational, and they leap to life in their very lack of reason; suddenly we realize how unbelievably rational most fictional characters are as they lead their lives from A to Z, like commuters always taking the same train." Biography, too, tends to trundle along settled tracks, departing from the childhood platform, admitting and ejecting passengers at intervals, finally arriving at the terminus of legacy and legend -- a linear transit in many ways ill-suited to the reversals and revisions of subjects' lives. Dispensing with the familiar acorn-to-oak approach, Schenkar instead declares that "[o]bsession . . . will be the organizing principle of this work," and exhumes Highsmith via a taxonomy of neuroses.

    Actually, Penzler said this:

    "She was a mean, hard, cruel, unlovable, unloving person," said acquaintance Otto Penzler. "I could never penetrate how any human being could be that relentlessly ugly."

    Now THAT'S a eulogy of a life spent making an impact on others. I'd shoot for the moon, but I'd probably just land in the weeds.

    Tuesday
    Dec012009

    The Marine by James Brady


    You do know that these Marines of ours were badasses, right?

    In his new novel, “The Marine,” author and columnist James Brady revisits the turbulent period of what he calls the “forgotten war,” a war that took 37,000 American lives.

    Brady visited The Saturday Early Show to discuss his book.

    The protagonist of “The Marine,” James “Ollie” Cromwell, was raised on Park Avenue, son to a lawyer, and educated in private schools. He studied hard and hit hard, his toughness developed from fighting with the German and Irish kids on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. His affluent upbringing led him to college at Notre Dame, just after the famed Knute Rockne years, in 1933.

    When his four years at Notre Dame ended, Ollie came to a crossroads, as most young men do at that time in their lives. His father asked him about his future. Brady writes in the book:

    “I’d like to see you go to law school after South Bend. You’ve got the grades. But that’s your call, Jim. I badgered you into football, and it didn’t work out very well. So you’ll get no pressure on law school. Have you thought what else you might do?”

    Ollie had expected the question and assumed it would come sooner or later. And he had thought about it for a long time now, back to Regis High, where the Jesuits started him off right away in freshman Latin on Julius Caesar’s “Gallic War.” They followed up with other tales, some in Latin, others in English, of Rome’s famed Tenth Legion, of their epic fights against Gauls and Belgians, and especially of Vercingetorix, noblest of the barbarians and a favorite of young Cromwell. It was Vercingetorix who got the boy to ponder soldiering, who set him on a path to boot camps where soldiers were made. What the “noblest of barbarians” didn’t do, a close perusal in history class of “Lee’s Lieutenants” did. And when he began Greek, Ollie realized that he preferred the Spartans, rude fellows who were forever waging war, to the Athenians, philosophers and aesthetes.

    “Yessir,” Ollie said now in the smokey Berlin dive; he had been thinking ahead. “Not many jobs out there waiting, not in hard times. I thought instead of three years at law school, I might go in the service for three or four years. No war on right now that involves us, and I can just wait out the Depression. Then try whatever comes along with my newfound maturity and store of globe-trotting adventures.” All this offhandedly, poking fun at himself.

    So it was settled and Cromwell joined the Marines, eventually ending up as a Marine detachment aboard the Navy cruiser “Juneau,” in San Diego. It was where he would meet the famous Evans Carlson, and become part of the famed “Raiders” unit. And it eventually led him through two of the biggest wars in American history, World War II and Korea.

    Interesting. Every day, fewer and fewer of these men are with us. Time marches on, but if we forget the lessons of the past, another bunch of young men are going to march off to another war, another Chosin Resevoir.
    Sunday
    Nov292009

    Book stores and Record Stores Are a Fading Memory

    Elliot Bay Book Store, Seattle, Washington

    This article just speaks to one particular book store in Seattle, Washington, but, really, it’s a metaphor for what’s happened to hundreds of very popular, high quality book and record stores all over the country:

    Amid the blues bars and rescue missions of Pioneer Square, Seattle’s storied intersection of sports and booze, art and vagrancy, the Elliott Bay Book Co. has stood as a symbol of comfortable, old-world erudition.

    For years, it has been one of the West’s few destination bookstores, a place tourists and locals alike visit for the sake of spending a couple of hours getting lost in its 140,000-some neatly stacked titles. When the last actual book downloads onto Kindle (at Amazon.com on the other side of town), Elliott Bay, one feels sure, will still be selling its musty, hard-bound predecessors, perused with a tangy cup of espresso in the basement cafe.

    So it is with no small degree of anguish that Seattle has reacted to the news that Elliott Bay is facing the likely choice of either moving across town or closing altogether when its lease is up Jan. 31.

    In some ways it is the familiar story of an independent bookstore getting hammered by book chains, online retailers and big-store discounters. But there are peculiar Seattle wrinkles.

    The city’s two downtown sports stadiums are bringing crowds of often-tipsy revelers through Pioneer Square, scaring the tourists and competing with locals for the ever-dwindling supply of parking.

    And during last year’s holiday season, any shoppers who might have been willing to jack up their credit cards during the recession stayed home anyway when an unusually heavy snowstorm paralyzed the hilly downtown streets for days.

    Technology is killing these stores, to put not too fine a point on it. Now that you can get any book or musical recording you want just by going online, that’s exactly what people have started to do. Their new behavior is to buy what they want online, and they do it for less because the saturation of options have lowered prices.

    Elliott Bay realized that a long time ago and added online shopping to the website that promotes the store. The problem is, they have to compete with thousands of small stores all over the country, and all over the world. Anyone willing to sell books online can create their own “store” and retail their own stock online, via portals like Amazon.com or E-bay. Instead of having to compete with stores in the vicinity, the vicinity becomes the entire world, especially for people who can navigate websites in other languages. Google translation solves that problem now—the web has now become universally understandable. And, with that, the reality that Google has put all the books online anyway—well, what’s a retailer to do?

    Go out of business, actually. Go out of business.