An American Lion

This is where Norman Rogers practices the manly art of curation.

Custom Search

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton

Norman Rogers recounts the summer he spent hiding from the stern love of his father and living as the world-famous “frisky mole boy” in the Groton, Connecticut sewer system. The Frisky Mole Boy of Groton seduced the women of the town and solved crimes, all while subsisting on a steady diet of depravity and confusion.

Rampage of the Innocents is my unfinished but brilliant Historical Romance Novel (now, with more sex and violence for my teenaged readers)

  Archives

Categories

drupal statistics module

PageRank Checker

TopOfBlogs

Blog directory

Independent Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

An American Lion - Blogged

BlogRankers.com

Blogs lists and reviews

 

blogarama - the blog directory

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

add page

http://www.wikio.com

Seed Newsvine

http://www.wikio.com/

Powered by Squarespace
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    An American Lion

    Entries in Aviation (41)

    Tuesday
    Aug102010

    Ted Stevens 1923-2010

    Senator Ted Stevens

    Friday
    Jul232010

    Sign Me Up for the Aerion Supersonic Business Jet

    Aerion Supersonic Business JetWhen I asked Peej whether or not I have ever flown on the late, lamented Concorde, he tossed a binder at me that documented my seven different flights on the thing, all of which were from 1984 to 1993. I was impressed, especially with the pie charts and the statistics given, right down to how many peanuts I ate and whether or not I was asked not to fly again (twice, but it's not like I'm paying attention).

    Come to find out, supersonic jet travel is back:

    Supersonic passenger travel was grounded in 2003 when British Airways and Air France cancelled their transatlantic Concorde service because of falling revenues and rising maintenance costs. The Aerion Supersonic Business Jet promises to help travelers break the sound barrier again.

    Named after a fleet-of-foot horse in Greek mythology, the Aerion Supersonic Business Jet will be able to carry a dozen passengers at speeds of up to Mach 1.5 for more than 4,000 miles. It is currently undergoing proof-of-concept aerodynamic testing of critical components in NASA wind tunnels and under the belly of a NASA F-15 supersonic jet.

    This Aerion SBJ will make it possible to fly from Paris to New York in four hours and 14 minutes, shaving three hours off the trip compared to conventional jets.

    And even in the United States, where supersonic flight is banned because of Federal Aviation Administration sonic boom restrictions, the jet will be able to fly at a high subsonic speed of Mach 0.98 because of its unique, patented wing design, reducing coast-to-coast travel by 41 minutes vs. conventional aircraft.

    Oh, come now. A sonic boom now and then doesn't hurt anything. The people who live near airports already know that there is always going to be a danger of sonic booms or aircraft parts or loose engines falling into their yard. It's their own fault if they haven't already treated their windows with anti-shattering film or taped them up with duct tape.

    This new aircraft has a chance at being a status symbol for the fabulous people. I hope the stigma of flying coach on an old jet returns. I can't stand the idea of rubbing shoulders with the hoi polloi. This is why we have never, ever flown coach.

    Tuesday
    Jul202010

    Guess Again, Poindexter

     

     

    If the Chinese want to terrify themselves over a UFO sighting, I say let them:

    Those probably were not UFOs that hovered over China recently, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology analyst said.

    The images of the UFOs have caused quite a stir in China and on blogs around the world.

    But many of the images appear to be faked with the software program Photoshop and the ones that were not faked seem to depict the launch of a Chinese ballistic missile, said Geoffrey Forden, an MIT weapons analyst.

    Forden, who also specializes in Russian and Chinese space systems, published his analysis on a blog called "Arms Control Wonk."

    In the analysis, Forden used scientific theories to examine the images of the flying object that he felt were not created with Photoshop.

    "It seems to me that a DF-21 (missile) launch somewhere near Jiuquan and aimed at a point somewhere in the eastern Gobi desert is the most likely cause of this 'UFO'", Forden wrote.

    You don't have a clue, do you Poindexter?

    What "scientific theories" did he use? Anyone with a brain of their own can look at the image shown above and tell that it is a man-made object and not a UFO. Whether or not it was "dressed up" or edited is hardly the main cause of concern here.

    Now, why would the Chinese be "demonstrating" a DF-21, and what the heck does that thing do, anyway?

    The US Department of Defense has stated that China is developing a conventionally-armed[9] high hypersonic[1] land-based anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) based on the DF-21,[10] with a range of up to 3,000 km (1,900 mi). This would be the world's first and only ASBM and the world's first weapons system capable of targeting a moving aircraft carrier strike group from long-range, land-based mobile launchers.[11][12] These would combine manoeuvrable reentry vehicles (MaRVs) with some kind of terminal guidance system. Such a missile may have been tested in 2005-6, and the launch of the Jianbing-5/YaoGan-1 and Jianbing-6/YaoGan-2 satellites would give the Chinese targeting information from SAR and visual imaging respectively. The upgrades would greatly enhance China's ability to conduct sea-denial operations to prevent US carriers from intervention in the Taiwan Strait.

    Now, correct me if I'm wrong but:

    The Pentagon on Monday announced aircraft carrier USS George Washington will visit South Korea this week, and participate in joint naval exercises in the coming months.

    The 97,000-ton massive warship will make a port visit to Busan on the southeastern tip of the Korean peninsula from July 21-25, and will be accompanied by three destroyers from its strike group. They include USS McCampbell and USS John S. McCain, which will visit Busan, and USS Lassen, which will visit Chinhae.

    The visit is considered to be a show of force, as George Washington commanding officer Capt. David Lausman said in a written statement the U.S. Navy's "robust forward presence in the Asia-Pacific region" is "a testament to the strength of our alliance and our constant readiness to defend the Republic of Korea."

    Oh, now I see what's going on here. Show's over, kids.

    The Chinese have suspected, probably for a good long while, that we would be sending ships to Korea in order to bolster our support for the South in the wake of the aggressive talk that the North has been engaging in ever since it torpedoed a South Korean naval vessel.

    Subtle or not, the Chinese are simply reminding people that they have secret weapons with lethal capabilities. They are not naive enough to think that anyone is going to buy the UFO theory; they want to create a little research and development mystique and get people thinking about China's own version of Area 51.

    Friday
    Jun252010

    John Pistole is Finally Confirmed

    Transportation Safety Administration head John PistoleThis is one of the most important jobs in the entire Federal Government, and it has just now been filled:

    After three tries, the Obama administration finally has an administrator for the Transportation Security Administration. John Pistole, who was deputy director of the FBI, was confirmed by the Senate Friday, with a voice vote.

    Two previous nominees withdrew, leaving the Department of Homeland Security agency without a permanent administrator since President Obama took office. One withdrew following disclosures that he provided Congress and the White House misleading information about incidents two decades ago. The second dropped out after senators questioned his business and personal dealings as a military contractor.

    While the air, rail and trucking issues the TSA oversees are critical to safety and security, the two largest federal employee unions have taken a strong interest in the position because of their desire to win collective bargaining rights for about 50,000 transportation security officers (TSO).

    During his confirmation hearings, Pistole took no position on collective bargaining rights for TSOs, saying he would review the issue if his nomination were approved. In response to a question, however, he did say that collective bargaining at the FBI would not improve national security.

    Did I just fall off the crazy train again? I must have. How else to explain that the nomination of a person to run the agency that is supposed to keep the transportation system safe can be held up over something as ridiculous as "collective bargaining?" And what an auspicious start for this poor man. He's the third choice, after all. Pretty soon, he was going to have to accept a job working for whoever thought it would be a good idea to move Federal jobs to places like West Virginia. Jeebus.

    Here's an idea--make the process really transparent. If you are the member of Congress holding something like this up, then you should have to answer for your hold. And then you should be willing to answer for the fact that the TSA has gone months and months without proper staffing or leadership or direction.

    It's 2010. How are unions even relevant anymore? I must not be firing on all cylinders anymore. With shrinking membership, I guess the bloated Federal government is the last refuge of the layabout union worker. Fine, lean on your brooms and eat your 4.6 donuts per coffee break. Could we at least get some air marshals up in the air who blend in? Could we have some common sense applied to how we keep things running safe? I mean, honestly. Can we get our heads out of our asses for a change?

    Is that asking too much?

    If something should happen, God forbid, then you certainly will know who this man is and I hope he is able to succeed in his post and make positive, common sense changes, and soon.

    Thursday
    Jun242010

    Common Sense Doesn't Apply When You Fly

    Virgin AirlinesI cannot, for the life of me, figure this out. If you have to pick up a hundred or so human beings and put them on a plane and fly them from point A to point B, you have to have a plan to keep them safe, get them there in one piece, and dump them out of the plane when the thing can't take off. I've written about this in the past, and I probably have done more than any other blogger to advance these issues. Ha! Made you look.

    It's a no-brainer. You can't leave people sitting on a plane that isn't going anywhere. It's like leaving someone in a hot car; it will boil their brain and turn them insane.

    Well, the Transportation Safety Administration is back in the news again, and it's just another ridiculous example of mismanagement and incompetence running amok:

    The pilot on a Virgin Atlantic flight that spent several hours on the tarmac after being diverted to Connecticut had asked for permission to unload the stranded passengers, but a customs official threatened to have them arrested if they did, the airline said Thursday.

    Customs officials denied the airline's allegation.

    The trans-Atlantic flight's captain was told by a customs official at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks that passengers couldn't get off the plane until more immigration officials arrived, Greg Dawson, an airline spokesman in London, said in an e-mail to The Associated Press. It took more than two hours for the officials to arrive, he said.

    Good luck finding someone who will be held accountable:

    A federal rule limiting tarmac time to three hours does not apply to international flights.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not receive a call from the pilot, and no one from the agency refused a request to allow passengers off the plane, said Theodore Woo, an agency spokesman in Boston.

    Customs officers headed for the airport "as soon as we got the call at 11 p.m.," Woo said. At that point, customs had enough officers to "escort passengers to a safe area," he said.

    Airport officials have said there was only one customs official at the airport Tuesday night when the flight arrived in Connecticut.

    "That's outrageous. If it's true, it's unacceptable," passenger rights advocate Kate Hanni said of Virgin Atlantic's allegation. She said she expects U.S. Transportation Department officials to listen to any audio recordings made of conversations between pilots and customs officials to verify the allegation.

    And, get this:

    An employee of another airline — the only person still working inside the terminal — refused to open a gate. Audio recordings showed the employee cited the absence of Transportation Security Administration workers in turning down the request.

    The Transportation Department should consider including Customs and Border Patrol and the TSA in future regulations related to tarmac strandings, Hanni said.

    "They appear to be a roadblock," said Hanni, founder of Flyersrights.org. "Often airlines tell us customs or TSA refused to allow passengers off planes."

    Fire whoever is making these decisions and get rid of that dead wood. Find capable people who can apply common sense and do the right thing by trapped and upset travelers. The Transportation Safety Administration may be the single greatest failure of all the Federal agencies, ever. It may actually be the worst possible agency every created. Fixing it might require firing everyone in it and drafting twenty or thirty thousand able-bodied Americans into it in order to hit the reset button and make it work once again. But, enough of my nonsense--your uncle Norman fixes problems. Oh, I can complain with the best of them. I can complain like a socialite being handed a Krispy Kreme donut stuck to a floppy paper plate. I can also think my way out of any problem you can throw at me.

    Here's how you solve this problem. Inside of every airport, create a bullpen.

    That's right--a bullpen.

    Create a safe area with access to food, water, bathrooms and alcohol. This area is where passengers who are not cleared by security go until they can be moved to a safe area of the airport. If you can't put someone on a plane and if you can't determine if they are a security threat (or a customs threat) then put them in the bullpen. Explain why you're putting them in the bullpen. Let them have free access to the Internet and a telephone, let them refresh and relax themselves, and do whatever is possible to get them from the bullpen back onto a plane that can take off or a terminal where they can go about their business.

    Each and every airline must answer as to why a passenger is sent to the bullpen. And if anyone is lost or abandoned in a bullpen, fine the airline and give the passenger a free ticket to their destination. Use common sense to provide a basic level of accommodation and comfort. Take firmly into account the needs of the elderly, the young, the nutty, the bold and the confused. Business travelers know the drill. Do something to help the annoying bastards who never fly and who cannot handle a little distress or discomfort. 

    Above all, remember to treat people like people, not cattle.

    Saturday
    Jun192010

    Why Build Something So Vulnerable?

    Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence VehicleI love blimps. It's just that simple.

    I love the big airships that fly over sporting events and I never get tired of standing on the ground, looking up at them like a tourist or an idiot--take your pick. I think they are nifty and should definitely be used to haul fat people across the country. If you built 200 blimps and made it so they could haul 200 people each, and then set it up so that they would cross the country from aerodrome to aerodrome, hauling only the people too fat to fly commercial aircraft, I'd call that heaven on Earth because I'm tired of sitting next to fatties on planes. The airships could have Lazy-Boys in them, and serve food round the clock (it would take six hours just to go a few hundred miles in one, I would guess). The efficiency would more than pay for itself. The bathrooms would have to be really, really sturdy. But I think it would be a big success.

    I'm pleased that the United States Army loves blimps as well. Too bad no one called their uncle Norman, because I could have sorted this out for them:

    The Army’s newest aircraft looks more like a Thanksgiving Day parade reject than the latest weapon against insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    But the Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle is expected to provide commanders with real-time intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance information, all from 20,000 feet.

    The $517 million, five-year contract to build up to three blimplike LEMVs was awarded to Northrop Grumman by the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command. While company officials wouldn’t provide a solid launch date, they said the first one should be floating over the skies of Afghanistan in about 18 months.

    The airship is the size of a football field, with a shell made of a soft fabric. While still in the testing phase, the craft would carry around 2,500 pounds of gear such as video, radar and sight sensors and stay deployed for 21 days. It can be piloted or function as an unmanned vehicle operated from a ground station.

    Sounds pretty nifty, doesn't it? Well, hold on, Cletus:

    The Army plans to operate the LEMV in the unmanned mode while deployed downrange. It doesn’t carry any defensive weapons so it will have to be based in a relatively secure location. At a top speed of 80 knots, it could be “vulnerable if it’s in the wrong neighborhood,” according to company officials.

    Let me guess--it's "unmanned" because it's going to be shot the hell down almost as soon as it deploys, am I correct? But, wait a minute--if it operates at 20,000 feet, why can't it be manned? No Afghan Taliban with a squirrel rifle is going to be able to knock it down, right? Well, unless it's tethered to the ground and has to go up and down to transfer personnel on and off the airship, right? So, if the thing is too vulnerable to put people on it, what good is it?

    Basically, because of the threat of shoulder-fired Surface to Air missiles, or MANPADs, the airship has to be flown into the theater and suspended high enough to keep it from being shot down. Then it has to be "brought down" after 21 days for refueling and refitting. So, the idea that it "solves" a lot of problems is kind of a misnomer because--and I'm speaking as someone who possesses what I like to call common sense--the enemy is going to know when this thing is flying and when it is not flying. Once they figure out what it is and what it does, they will know when they can move around and communicate and when they have to go silent and try to mask their activities. 

    In effect, for all of the money spent on this machine, it's a great big unmanned babysitter that sits in the sky and, when it is operational, won't collect much of anything useful and, when it is down for maintenance and refueling, will be a sitting duck wherever it is parked and our enemies will know it's not operational and will do business as usual. It's extremely vulnerable to a MANPAD if it ever sniffs at an altitude below 6,000 meters, so wherever they station it, they have to clear out the area around that location for several miles in all directions. If they base this vehicle anywhere in Afghanistan, it becomes a sitting duck for anyone who can get close enough (roughly within a few kilometers). Bear in mind, our troops in Afghanistan suffer attacks on a regular basis because the enemy is not afraid to get within a hundred meters and start shooting.

    As much as I like airships, this one I don't much think is very useful.

    Friday
    May212010

    When My Weird Love For You Costs Me My Career

    Jet Blue, How do I love you, let me count the ways...You know what, baby? I love you.

    I love you so much, it hurts.

    When you told me I was creepy, and threw my stuff into the dumpster, it hurt me, baby. It hurt me like I've never been hurt before. It hurt like the cancellation of Ghost Whisperer, baby. It hurt like Bactine on a canker sore. It hurt me like I was being run over by one of those big sleds that gets pulled by a horse, and it hurt like one of those sled runners went right into my heart and flattened it to pieces, baby.

    So, either we're getting back together, or I'm going to send an E-mail to you on my phone and say something really stupid:

    A JetBlue pilot was removed from a flight after reportedly threatening to crash the plane he was set to fly, but the airline has dismissed the claim as "vicious rumor and speculation."

    JetBlue confirms the unidentified pilot was taken off the plane, which was scheduled to depart from Logan Airport in Boston Thursday afternoon, but cited health reasons for the decision. 

    According to 
    CBS station WBZ in Boston, the pilot was taken into custody after allegedly sending an email to his girlfriend in which he said if they did not reconcile their relationship, he was going to crash the plane. 

    The officer was questioned by the FBI at the airport, and taken to a Boston hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. 

    Authorities reportedly found the email on the pilot's phone. 

    Can I sleep in your garage, baby? Just until I get on my feet.

    After all, it's your fault I went nuts and ruined my career, baby. Thank God United is hiring, otherwise I might have to go live with your mother again, baby.

    Thursday
    May202010

    The Transportation Security Administration is a Scam

    Mr. Badger, your facial expression tells me you would like to speak to a managerForget this silly program--the whole thing is a scam:

    There's a hidden layer of airport security most people don't know about. It's called "behavior detection," and involves specially trained Transportation Security Administration employees whose primary mission is to spot terrorists. 

    They look for unique facial expressions and body language that may identify a potential threat. About 3,000 of these officers work at 161 U.S. airports -- costing taxpayers nearly $200 million in 2009. This year, the TSA asked Congress for $20 million more to expand the program. 

    But 
    CBS News has learned that the program is failing to catch terrorists. It's never even caught one. 

    In fact, sources tell CBS News a Government Accountability Office investigation is raising serious questions about the program. 

    The GAO uncovered at least 16 individuals later accused of involvement in terrorist plots flew 23 different times through U.S. airports since 2004. Yet none were stopped by TSA behavior detection officers working at those airports. 

    What a crack-up. They haven't even caught one? Those are some numbers that are not going to make it easy to justify the existence of this program. How would you like to be the guy who has to write that up--we deserve more money and continued funding because...we haven't even stopped a single terrorist?

    Do you know what these clowns are doing all day? They're reading my blog, sir. But, they're reading the Safe For Work Hotties part of the blog, and that's a darned shame. I would prefer that they bounce back and forth between my sterling wit and the half-naked babes, but I'm a renaissance man--that's what we do. We get super serious, we have some fun, then we look at Alektra Blue. What's not to like?

    Friday
    May072010

    Can You Blame Him?

    *

    I probably would have done the same thing:

    According to police, a Miami International Airport security screener "lost his mind" and attacked a co-worker, after being repeatedly mocked for not being so impressive...y'know...masculinely...south of the border. 

    Okay: The other guy said he had a tiny penis.

    Rolando Negrin was arrested Tuesday night on charges of aggravated battery after allegedly beating up a co-worker with a not-at-all-phallic baton.  

    The co-worker had reportedly mocked his genitalia for the past year after Negrin walked through a new, high-tech body scanner. 

    Linger on that: this guy apparently got made fun of for a full year.

    Workers with the Transportation Security Administration saw the 44-year-old's body during training of full-body imaging machines. The alleged victim of the attack apparently latched onto Negrin's package, and just wouldn't let go of it. Metaphorically.

    The police report says Negrin told police he "could not take the jokes anymore and lost his mind." The victim was not seriously injured.

    I hate how the article is written, but there it is.

    This is the sort of thing that brings to mind the idea of "fighting words." These are things that you say to someone that can cause an instant reaction of violence, and, if I'm not mistaken, and I rarely am, then the legal jeopardy that comes with beating the tar out of someone can be mitigated by the defense if they can claim "fighting words."

    I certainly cannot blame Rolando Negrin for deciding that he had had enough. Polite society is bad enough already, but, what I cannot understand is how his unfunny (and, let's face it, annoyingly obsessed) co-worker shouldn't be blamed for inciting the attack with his "fighting words." Negrin has been suspended; I hope the poor man isn't fired.

    The real issue here is skipped over, as usual. How is it that we have such immature jackasses working in such a sensitive area of public safety? Shouldn't we just make up our minds to pay every TSA worker a hundred thousand dollars a year, with the stipulation being that we want mature, educated, professional people who will give us dedication and competence in exchange for such a good salary? Shouldn't we put these people in another category of civil servant? And, shouldn't we get rid of the people who can't stop talking about someone's penis?

    *Miranda picked the video. No idea what it is about.

    Thursday
    Apr292010

    Normalcy Returns?

    Central Europe, 29 April 2010The skies over Europe are looking a little more well-traveled today.