Space Trash Gets Cubed

Space Junk, Artist Unknown

Somewhere in my archives, I wrote about this:

UK researchers have developed a device to drag space debris out of orbit.

They plan to launch a demonstration of their "CubeSail" next year. It is a small satellite cube that deploys a thin, 25-sq-m plastic sheet.

Residual air molecules still present in the spacecraft's low-Earth orbit will catch the sheet and pull the object out of the sky much faster than is normal.

The Surrey Space Centre team says the concept could be fitted to larger satellites and even rocket stages.

The group also envisages that a mature system would even be sent to rendezvous and dock with redundant spacecraft to clean them from orbit.

I still think my idea was the best one, but you'll have to be the judge of that:

My solution is a spiraling vehicle that pushes space junk ahead of itself--think of a space equivalent of a bulldozer that never comes back. This vehicle is launched into orbit, and there it deploys a massive basket-shaped appendage ahead of it. Using predetermined coordinates, it pushes outward from the Earth's gravitational pull, gathering bits of space debris ahead of it that are moving with it as it leaves orbit, not against it because that would cause a catastrophic collision. As the net collects slower-moving debris and pushes it forward, the "net" uses small hooks, magnets (although a lot of space debris probably won't stick to a magnet because they tend to use a lot of aluminum alloys), grabbers, and adhesives to hold on to the debris--it's not just the big items, but the nuts and bolts we have to worry about as well.

Once the device has cleared orbit, and effectively cleared the path ahead of it, a second stage rocket fires, pushing it away from the Earth at a rate that will prevent it from falling back into orbit. Affix a warning beacon and let the device push away from the Earth at a leisurely pace.

I have to confess that I never followed up on it. Does that make me a terrible blogger? Sure. But it also means I'm a busy man. I put these things on my blog so that people can benefit from my brilliance. I can't be expected to be entirely organized, though. Peej is out of town and I'm tired.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Veronika Vanoza is Safe For Work

Veronika Vanoza

Veronika Vanoza

I've always liked this set, and I refer to it whenever I need an image of an Eastern European hottie in a shower.

Veronika Vanoza

Veronika Vanoza

Veronika Vanoza has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Tory Lane is Safe For Work

Tory Lane

I adore Tory Lane; she looks like someone who has fun being a model, but what she does can't be entirely fun. Half the time, she does have her clothes on, it would seem.

Tory Lane

Tory Lane

Tory Lane

Tory Lane has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Alektra Blue is Safe For Work

Alektra Blue

Alektra Blue is such a spectacularly ravishing young model. She can end or start a war, just with a look over at the wrong combatant.

Alektra Blue

Alektra Blue

Alektra Blue

Alektra Blue has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Anita Corso is Safe For Work

Anita Carso

I don't know much about Anita Corso, except that she's beautiful and deserves her own special place in my Safe For Work Hotties gallery. I'm trying to expand it, and I'm trying to add more to it. I have instructed my son Byron to expand the gallery and improve it, where possible.

Anita Carso

Anita Carso

Anita Carso

Anita Carso

Anita Corso has a gallery of her own here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

When Did Ignoring Abusive Priests Become a "New" Story?

There were many who predicted that the ascension of this Pope would lead to scandal, and those people were, of course, correct:

A Vatican newspaper editorial said the claims were an "ignoble" attack on the Pope and that there was no "cover-up".

The head of the UK Catholic church said the Pope had made important changes to the way abuse was dealt with.

The Catholic church has been hit by a series of allegations in Europe and the US over the past months.

The latest allegations stem from the US, after it emerged that Archbishops had complained in 1996 about a priest, Fr Lawrence Murphy. Their complaints went to a Vatican office led by the future Pope Benedict XVI, but apparently received no response.

One victim told the BBC the Pope had known of a cover-up "for many years".

Arthur Budzinski, now 61, said Pope Benedict should confess about what he knew.

"The Pope knew for many, many years."

I've been following this story for twenty years, actually, going all the way back to 1990, when the Catholic diocese in Winona, Minnesota was rocked by a scandal involving a priest and sexual abuse (one of the women who divorced me and left me with the children went to St. Mary's College in Winona back in the 1970s). These incidents came from the same time frame, roughly, and the same part of the United States as the St. Francis, Wisconsin incidents.

The Diocese of Winona revealed in its first public accounting of sexual abuse allegations that 13 diocesan priests had 48 allegations of sexual abuse of minors brought against them during the past 50 years.

Bishop Bernard Harrington reported figures in this month's issue of the diocese's official newspaper, The Courier. Three allegations were shown to be false and 12 were withdrawn. Harrington noted that the last case of abuse occurred in 1984.

The Roman Catholic diocese's insurance companies have also paid $3.7 million in settlements during the past 15 years resulting from "abuse by clergy, religious, or lay employees who are employed by the Diocese or its parishes and institutions," Harrington wrote. Of that amount, $3.5 million was paid before 1993 in a case against "one accused perpetrator."

In the last 15 years, the diocese itself paid $1.2 million in legal costs and settlements related to abuse, Harrington said, with all but $100,000 of that amount going to the victims of the same unnamed "accused perpetrator" before 1993. The diocese also paid an additional $900,000 in the past 15 years in "pastoral care" costs, including counseling and therapy, for those affected by abuse, including priests, Harrington wrote.

It always amazes me that no one remembers what happened in Southern Minnesota back when this issue was just beginning to really pick up steam. Had anyone been paying attention, doubtless the ascension of Cardinal Ratzinger would have been reason enough to consider another for Pope. Until the Catholic Church finally relents, and chooses a charismatic figure from Latin America, someone untouched by the scandals and sex abuse, you can expect more stonewalling and denial.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

What's the Real Argument Against Health Care Reform?

The lesson of health care reform would seem to be "if not now, when?" and "never expect much from a corrupt group of money-grubbing fools." I know one thing--I haven't learned a thing from the experience, other than "they'll never focus on what is important."

If you want to view the coverage from a U.S. perspective, you'll become embroiled in the confusing alliances that major media corporations have formed with whoever is still paying to keep their lousy programs on the air. It's hard to detect the bias, but the bias comes from a reporter or correspondent who has had to sit in front of lawyers and corporate suits, and has been asked to tweak or tone down their strident tone about the uninsured. If that hasn't happened, fine and dandy. If it has, then I'm not at all surprised that the coverage in the U.S. has focused on the political back and forth and the needs of major corporations. Rarely have I seen anything that focuses on how health care reform would help a small businessman or keep someone from filing bankruptcy.

The BBC does run this piece today:

The BBC's Richard Lister in Washington says that in recent days Democrats have begun to seize back control of the healthcare argument, and opinion polls suggest that more Americans now believe this reform is a good idea.

However, he says, Republicans are threatening to reform or repeal this legislation should they gain control in the mid-term elections in November.

On Thursday, President Obama responded to that challenge, saying: "I welcome that fight."

He was speaking during a visit to Iowa, as he embarked on a campaign to sell the new programme to the American public.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said: "Republicans... will continue to fight until this bill is repealed and replaced with commonsense ideas that solve our problems without dismantling the healthcare system we have and without burying the American dream under a mountain of debt."

If the fight is to be joined, then "repeal" is hardly the position that will win the debate. What if some aspect of health care reform (weak as it is) actually works? How do you successfully argue that a program that hasn't been enacted yet should be repealed? Many of the provisions and reforms don't start to impact the American people for years. How does anyone make an intellectually honest argument for repeal when nothing has happened yet? You cannot make the argument that it's about money when Washington has spent money as if it were nothing for the better part of a decade on things we do not need.

You do not win with obstructionism; you win with a better idea. "Repeal" is not an idea; it's an act of desperation. When someone comes up with an idea that makes health care reform help a small businessman more than what's been passed will, then that's the idea that should be pursued. Until then, what is there to fight about? If over 30 million people can now get some form of health care coverage, what is there to complain about? Shouldn't that have been a worthy goal of any reform?

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Time For a Break

Since the inception of this blog, and the three or four different versions of it that have existed, I have only taken short breaks to attend The Masters. This year, I'm probably going to attend The Masters, but, before that, I'm going to take an extended break. From now until the end of the month or so, I'm not going to blog. I'm going to concentrate, and think, and come up with brilliant ideas. I'm going to put the full weight of my considerable talents to thinking, which I haven't done in years. Oh, that's not as bad as it sounds. For long stretches of my life, I have subsisted on snap decisions and bald-faced rage, without any thinking being done at all. Thinking is overrated. Doing is underrated.

Now would be a good time to point out that my blogs are like beacons of hope in a world possessed by mediocrity and fear. I have a few things that I like to call The Best of the Blog. If you have stomach that, you can run with billy goats and feast on anything, sir. You can trip through Celebrity Disaster and then find yourself on a sports tangent with Talking Smack About Sports. I am a Gentleman Bounty Hunter, you know, and I do like my Safe For Work Hotties.

When I come back, I hope I'm not rusty and boring. If so, I'll probably demand more of myself. I may search for scapegoats and look for a dingbat to take the fall, but I won't tolerate boring. Not here or anywhere else.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Your Privacy Means Nothing to a Predator

Predator

I realize we sold our privacy rights down the river so that politicians could feel better about doing nothing to protect us, but I didn't know we would reach this point. The point where the revelation that drones are flying over American citizens on a regular basis, trying to catch criminals and whatnot, would be met with indifference. I can predict the indifference. I can tell you, without hesitation, that the media won't explain this and the American people won't be told why this is not such a great idea and how it can lead to abuses of power. Is there anyone who will sit down and explain to you that the reason why we don't let the cops listen to every phone call being made in the country is because, if they did, everyone in America would be in jail, including, of course, 99% of the cops?

When you apply technology to law enforcement, you cannot apply a level of technology greater than the need to stop only the most reprehensible of crimes. You have to have a threshold where technology cannot become overkill. Yes, the police would like to have helicopter gunships. Do they get helicopter gunships to help them solve problems with high speed chases and grannies with canes who run amok through miniature golf courses? No, they don't. This is because, once you give Johnny Law a helicopter gunship and tell him to solve his problems with it, you end up with Johnny Law using a helicopter gunship to shut down illegal lemonade stands. Human beings naturally abuse their power; when you have limited government, you throw a monkey wrench into that whole sort of thing. And, for good reason. Helicopter gunships really aren't good for anything, other than shooting and killing vast numbers of people. And, do we really want that in our back yards? Let's hope that answer stays "no" until I finally pass away out of this crazy world.

Do you think it's an accident that this sort of thing comes out just as American Idol kicks into high gear?

It's a frigid, dark night in the mountainous border region of southeast Arizona. A group of 31 suspected illegal immigrants are walking up and down rocky ridges toward Tucson, Arizona. They're wearing small backpacks and stop to rest every few minutes.

This isn't a scene unfolding before the eyes of Border Patrol agents on the ground. It comes from a video image provided by a Predator B unmanned aircraft 19,000 feet overhead. In fact, the nearest Border Patrol agents are far away.

Jerry Kersey is the Customs and Border Protection agent in charge of this night's Predator mission. He and his two-man crew relay the information to Border Patrol agents from a small trailer 40 miles from the scene.

Kersey directs the agents on the ground, who are wearing night-vision goggles.

"Stop! Stop! They're to your right," Kersey firmly dictates over a radio transmission. "They must see you. The group is running."

Is this really where we want to go as a society and as a country? Are we really comfortable handing over such over-the-top technology to the border patrol?

You might very well agree with the idea of using drones in this manner; well, why not use them to catch speeders, then? Why not use them to catch jaywalkers and punks with spraypaint cans? Why not fly one over every home in America just to make sure everyone is doing what they're supposed to do, and make it so that it can peek through walls so that we're all comfortable with what's going on inside?

Once you let them do what they will, getting that genie back in the bottle becomes a little more difficult. Once you give your consent to being tracked, searched, recorded, databased, datamined and retained for all eternity, you don't get that back. You cannot say "stop!" and you cannot make the case that they've "gone too far" because, we, as a nation, crossed that threshold years ago.

Believe me when I tell you this--you don't know how valuable your privacy is until you no longer have it.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Anita Dark in a Leather Top

Anita Dark

Anita Dark can make a gloomy day better just by showing up.

Anita Dark

Anita Dark

Anita Dark

Anita Dark has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Ben Roethlisberger is in the Process of Destroying His Own Career

There's nothing wrong with having fun, but when you're rich, famous, and known to be a bit of a party animal, you have to know when to control yourself:

Amber Hanley, a 21-year-old college student who met NFL star Ben Roethlisberger in a Georgia bar, says the Steeelers quarterback wanted more than a just a cute photo with the young co-ed, but she just rolled her eyes and moved on, earning a tongue lashing from Big Ben. Later, she says, Roethlisberger was hitting hard on another girl. Illegal, poor taste or just drunk fun? Hanley's description of last Friday's events at the Capital City bar in Milledgeville, Ga., doesn't shed light on whether Roethlisberger sexually assaulted another woman during a night in which he visited several local bars. Police are now investigating the accusation made by a 20-year old student and the football player has denied it.
He really needs some sort of help, and not just of the legal kind. He needs someone to help him get off the path that he's on before he destroys his career. I have defended him in the past, but how do you defend a kid who is blotto? How do you defend a kid who is running around like a jackass in public?

Hey, I've got a sports blog, you know...

Posted via web from TalkingSmackAboutSports

When Educators Are Too Stupid to Educate

I want to draw your attention to two things that struck me as being symptomatic of where America is headed as far as education is concerned--straight off of a cliff.

In Kansas City, they want to close half of the public schools. As shocking as that might sound, the combined effects of mismanagement and declining enrollment should have already brought about that eventuality:

Kansas City was held up as a national example of bold thinking when it tried to integrate its schools by making them better than the suburban districts where many kids were moving. The result was one school with an Olympic-sized swimming pool and another with recording studios.

Now it's on the brink of bankruptcy and considering another bold move: closing nearly half its schools to stay afloat.

Schools officials say the cuts are necessary to keep the district from plowing through what little is left of the $2 billion it received as part of a groundbreaking desegregation case.

Buffeted for years by declining enrollment, political squabbling and a revolving door of leadership, the district's fortunes are so bleak that Superintendent John Covington has said diplomas given to many graduates "aren't worth the paper they're printed on."

At one point, the Kansas City school district had 75,000 students; today it has barely 35,000. In other words, people voted with their feet.

In Detroit, people are not only voting with their feet, they are cringing when they read their E-mail:

As if Detroit doesn't have enough problems these days, the president of the city's school board offered the shocking admission that he can't pen a coherent sentence.

Otis Mathis, who oversees the academic future of 90,000 public school students, told the Detroit News that he's a "horrible writer" after reports surfaced that he sent a Feb. 29 e-mail to the financial manager of Detroit Public Schools that was rife with spelling, punctuation and usage errors.

"If you saw Sunday's Free Press that shown Robert Bobb the emergency financial manager for Detroit Public Schools, move Mark Twain to Boynton which have three times the number seats then students and was one of the reason's he gave for closing school to many empty seats," the e-mail read, according to the paper.

Mathis, 56, of Detroit, has had difficulties with language as early as fourth grade, when he was placed in special education classes. His college degree was also held up for more than a decade due to repeatedly failing English proficiency exams required for graduation from Wayne State University, the paper reported.

If you're going to run things and educate kids, shouldn't you be able to do math (declining enrollment means you need fewer schools) and write a sentence (huh? what the hell is that about?) or am I simply being ridiculous?

Lowering our standards does not mean everyone gets to feel better about themselves. All it does is institutionalize marginal incompetence and stupidity. We don't need that in a great nation. We need tougher standards, better schools, and people who can actually function as adults.

Cross posted at my blog...

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Amber Evans Can't Help it if She Looks Fabulous

Amber Evans

Amber Evans knows how to tempt and how to look fabulous. Every time I think about how my life would be so radically different without her, I have an involuntary shudder.

Amber Evans

Amber Evans

Amber Evans

Amber Evans has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Who's Giving Advice to The Donald These Days?

Melania must be confusing the Donald with her womanly charms...

Have a look at this, and then tell me who wins:

"Celebrity Apprentice" is back, with a weird group that includes Daryl Strawberry, Cyndi Lauper, Bret Michaels, Sharon Osbourne, Sinbad, and best of all, disgraced former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich. Please get him and Donald Trump in the room, because all that hair and all that ego is bound to cause some kind of weird disturbance in the Force. (March 14, 9 p.m., NBC.) 

Do you see anyone--anyone--on that list who could win? I do not. The Donald is getting poor advice. I don't know if I blame Melania, but I sure like posting old photos of her.

I see a list of people who have had success and failure and infamy and the usual downfalls and pitfalls and I see no winners. I see a ridiculous D-list farce. Where's Kathy Griffin when you need her? Where's the little fellow who was in the Austin Powers films? Where's Erik Estrada and the dude who signed on to do all of those Free Credit Report Dot Com ads?

Posted via web from Celebrity Disaster

Is Ireland Abandoning the Catholic Church

While I don't have a problem with religion, I certainly prefer secular societies that know the proper place of religion in their politics and culture. Ireland seems to be reaching that point as well, and, just so you know, the proper place to me is separate and distant. Your government should never be religious-based, and your religion should never be based on taking control of the government.

The overwhelming influence of the Catholic Church in Ireland is well known; seeing Irish priests kiss the ring of the Pope shouldn't elicit anything other than delight in the faithful. In point of fact, the opposite has happened--many Irish citizens are angry that the current Pope has done nothing to help address the sexual abuse crimes committed by members of the church:

Andrew Madden, the first person in Ireland to go public about his abuse by a priest, described the meetings at the Vatican as "a complete waste of time" and the greatest act of window dressing he had ever seen. Abuse survivor Marie Collins saidit was an insult that the resignation of bishops didn't even make the agenda. Additionally, she said it was deplorable that the pope's statement was "so far away from accepting that there was a policy of coverup."

Of course, it's not unusual for bishops to kiss the pope's ring, and the Vatican has always been heavily male and ornate. The difference now is that Irish Catholics, after decades of alienation from the church, are finally nearing a breaking point.

Not so very long ago and for the great majority of Irish people, their Catholicism was synonymous with their national identity. To be Irish was to be Catholic. It was something of which most Irish were very proud.

In the latter part of the 19th century, the church grew to become the most powerful civic institution on the island, controlling most of Ireland's schools and the greater number of its hospitals.

This allowed the church unparalleled influence throughout most of the 20th century in what is now known as the Republic of Ireland. That continued to be the case until the latter decades of the last century when its influence began to wane due to increased affluence and a better-educated population. With the events of the last few years, church leaders can no longer ignore the extent to which they've lost control of Irish society.

In this way, the scandal doesn't really mirror what happened in the United States. Going back at least twenty years, legal cases have been brought against the church in the United States. Accountability has had a long, tough road in the United States but, at the very least, many victims have had a chance to appear in court and see their abusers punished. The church has withdrawn priests and hid them; in Ireland, they simply refuse to acknowledge the crimes.

This has to figure into how the church approaches the issue of priest sex abuse. In a country where there is a highly developed legal system or a small number of practicing faithful, the chances of the criminal code being applied to the church and then issuing a severe punishment is fairly high. In Ireland, the church is very closely tied to the government and the culture. Not only does this account for a lack of accountability, it also accounts for the possibility that the problem will never be solved or dealt with. That means more victims, more coverups, and more obstruction.

Posted at my blog...

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Catalina Cruz and the Power of Mystery

Catalina Cruz

Catalina Cruz is mysterious here, but that's probably because I'm not smart enough to know what the mystery is about.

Catalina Cruz

Catalina Cruz

Catalina Cruz

Catalina Cruz has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Norman Rogers Solves Another Burning Issue No Other Blogger Will Deal With

As the father of a daughter, I can tell you unequivocally--sexual harassment has no place in the workplace. I'm extremely proud of the fact that no one ever filed those charges against me, even during the early 1990s when women were filing lawsuits every three or four minutes, on average. I'm also proud of being a blogger who solves problems, rather than just sitting around complaining about them with one hand on the snark button and the other end up my nose. I bring it and I leave it when I tackle a serious problem. I am not afraid to howl and stomp after difficult answers. I don't take the easy way out. The easy way is where things always go wrong.

With that in mind, let me solve some problems and sort things out. Here's what you do when a woman sexually harasses you--give in! Have glorious sex with her! Make her woof and pant and and beg for more, sir. Make her use nonsensical words and saran wrap-covered gouache drawings to explain what she wants. Make her switch from Catholic to Episcopalian and then back again if she doesn't do it fast enough. Make her clip coupons and purchase lubricants online.

Then, when the dust settles and when she's a cooing, rapturous puddle at your feet, tell her you quit and go find another job. Tell her that, as she protests and grabs your ankles, that the best sex of her life is walking out the door, dignity intact, manliness firmly in hand. Don't even bother putting on your clothes. When they see you walking naked through the hotel, flex your biceps and say something Bruce Campbell would be proud of.

Now, I don't know what you're supposed to do if it's a same-sex situation and your barn door won't swing that way. I guess you would have to go to court, then. But, if you're a man, and a woman is sexually harassing you, do what I outlined above. Don't go to court.

Here, see what you think of this:

Jonathan Pilkington's boss wouldn't take no for an answer.

During more than two years as a food runner at an upscale steakhouse in Scottsdale, Ariz., Pilkington says his male supervisor groped, fondled and otherwise sexually harassed him more than a dozen times.

"It was very embarrassing," Pilkington said. "I felt like I had to do something because the situation was just so bad."

I agree--Mr. Pilkington had to go to court. He had to do something. Giving in? Not an option. This is why women should never give in to the advances of men. How piggish we are as a society to think that we once counseled women to do just that.

In the event of something like this:

Cases involving women making unwanted advances toward men may also be rising as women make up a growing part of the work force. Last year, the Regal Entertainment Group, which operates a national chain of movie theaters, agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit by a male employee who claimed a female co-worker repeatedly grabbed his crotch at work.

When the employee complained to his supervisor and the theater's then-general manager, he claims, she failed to stop the harassment and instead retaliated against the victim with unfair discipline and lower performance evaluations.

That's where you leave her a hot mess on shaky bedrails and quit then and there. Nothing cools a situation like a little old-fashioned moral supremacy and honest-to-goodness testosterone. Remember to tell your wife you did it because America demanded it of you; she'll understand that the needs of the country have to come before all other considerations. Yes, you took your female superior to a Motel 6 and threw her ankles over her head and left the impression of one of your butt cheeks firmly embedded in the sheetrock over the bed because those low ceilings got in the way. You did it for your country, though. That absolves you of guilt, you see.

Every law suit that doesn't get filed allows America to grow stronger and happier. Every lawyer that sits idle is a blessing from Heaven. To keep us from failing as a society, the likes of you are going out and doing the likes of her, and you're not even bothering to put on your tighty-whiteys when you're done saving America. And, your various bloggers like myself thank you for your sacrifices. God speed to you, sir. You laid some pipe in a fusty tunnel, and then you dumped that frump in her own wet spot in order to maintain your dignity. You're like an old salty dog, you.

I can't wait to buy you a beer. America owes you a beer, in fact. Make sure that you let the boys down at the American Legion know you took one for the team. Just say it was in the war. Half of those bastards have never heard a shot fired in anger anyway.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

The Germans Aren't Afraid of Shoeless Fools and Pretend Ninjas

See if you can figure this out, because I certainly can. Despite the threat of terrorism, you have a Western democracy coming down on the side of privacy, rather than panic and fear. Sadly, it's not the United States.

Vast amounts of telephone and e-mail data held in Germany must be deleted, the country's highest court has ruled.

The constitutional court overturned a 2008 law requiring communications data to be kept for six months.

The law - designed to combat terrorism and serious crime - required telecoms companies to keep logs of calls, faxes, SMS messages, e-mails and internet use.

But nearly 35,000 Germans lodged complaints against it, arguing that the law violated their right to privacy.

Responding to the thousands of formal complaints, Germany's constitutional court described the law as a "particularly serious infringement of privacy in telecommunications".

In contrast, political calculations and a stunning lack of cojones seems to prevail in this country:

President Obama signed a one-year extension of three sections of the USA Patriot Act on Saturday without any new limits on the measures that many liberal groups and Democrats said were necessary to safeguard American civil liberties.

The provisions allow the government, with permission from a special court, to obtain roving wiretaps over multiple communication devices, seize suspects’ records without their knowledge, and conduct surveillance of a so-called “lone wolf,” or someone deemed suspicious but without any known ties to an organized terrorist group.

The Patriot Act drew heavy criticism from Democrats – Obama even once saidit needed to be dialed back – during the Bush administration. But experts suggest that a string of foiled terrorist plots over the past year combined with the Democrats' falling ratings amid the healthcare debate blunted any move to reform the act, which was passed in the wake of 9/11.

“We’ve stopped 28 terrorist attacks since 9/11,” says James Carafano, a homeland security expert at The Heritage Foundation. “The Patriot Act has been a big part of that."

He says the only disappointment regarding Obama’s extension of the three temporary provisions is that “it was only for one year.” That, he says, may have been done “so they won’t get beat up so much on the left.”

Well, I wouldn't use that number 28 so freely. Many of those were pretty half-assed. At least two or three of those involved people who couldn't even afford adequate footwear, and at least one of those involved a self-described American ninja, I believe.

I won't bother to go and dig up all of the things President Obama said against the Patriot Act; I won't even bother to go see what Glenn Greenwald had to say about it. Shame on the Republican Party for foisting it upon us. We should have kept things the way they were; what better way to tell the men with rags on their head to go pound sand. These colors may not run, but they'll shit themselves seven shades of brown over the idea of someone thinking there might be a terrorist talking in the open on his cell phone in Grand Forks about going to Tuscaloosa to buy a gallon of paint from a man from Spokane. The Patriot Act only works if the terrorists are abject fools with a talkative streak and no operational security, sir.

I will just point out that, at one time, you couldn't get elected dogcatcher in this country without having a position on privacy and on protecting the rights of Americans to be safe from unlawful search and seizure. Now, you can pretty much bet on the fact that millions of Americans will sign away their firstborn and every halfwit databit of their private information just so that there's no chance whatsoever that they won't have to think about being attacked by a terrorist.

Boo! Are you scared, sir? I hope not. Cowboy up.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

They'll Never Count Me in this Lifetime

I'm not proud of the fact that I have never been counted in the census. I'm sure that some wag out there will point out that I probably was counted, but didn't realize it, but there is one thing you need to remember. I'm Norman Rogers. My Father was one of the few defense industrialists in the nation who had the money and the influence to ensure that he wasn't counted by the census; he passed that along to me by accident.

Here it is, 2010, and we are living abroad, and no, we won't be counted. We left Maryland after the snow destroyed civilization as we know it. We fled like crazed foxes, flushed out of a den by napalm. We hit the road and didn't look back. We ran for the airport, abandoning the Chevy Suburban at the airport with the engine running, all of the doors open, and the extra set of keys on the seat in case the person who took it wanted an extra set. I even signed off on the title. I hope whoever found a Suburban at the airport is enjoying it. Knowing Maryland, the thing is probably still there, but with a ticket and a bum sleeping in the back on my old blankets. Peej said that we should have just given it to the needy, but I have always felt that the needy wouldn't know what to do with a Suburban. The needy need Hondas, not Chevys.

In all of the census years, the Rogers family has left America for just long enough to avoid being counted by the census. We went to Switzerland in 2000, we went to Germany in 1990, we went to Mexico in 1980, and we went to Fiji in 1970. We went to Bombay in 1960, we went to Canada in 1950 and I wasn't around in 1940. I think Father went to Haiti or Cuba. I know he spent 1930 in Singapore. We are still banned in Singapore, even though eighty years have passed. I know this because I made a call to the U.S. State Department and, yes, the Rogers family and all descendants are still banned from traveling to Singapore, Myanmar, Argentina, North Korea and Liechtenstein.

This year, we are living in the U.S. Virgin Islands, but not really. We have a house, but we really spend most of our time on the Admiral Hassenpfeffer. We'll be in St. Kitts before you can say boo. We'll probably make it to Aruba before the end of March, but I don't know. Miranda is making noises about Bermuda. Census takers have never caught a Rogers. They might catch you, but they're not going to catch us:

President Obama recently encouraged Americans to "take about 10 minutes to answer 10 questions" and fill out their 2010 census form.

This year's questionnaire is one of the shortest in history, but the results of the survey have long-term effects.

The census, taken every 10 years, is used to determine how to allocate more than $400 billion in federal funds and seats House of Representatives and determine the boundaries of representatives' districts.

"There is no representative democracy without it. It's the scientific, nonpartisan, apolitical starting point of what eventually becomes a quite partisan, political process," said Kenneth Prewitt, a professor at Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs and the former director of the United States Census Bureau.

The hell you say, Poindexter. The hell you say.

Posted via web from An American Lion is on Posterous

Annette Dawn on Cobblestones Works for Me

Annette Dawn

Annette Dawn

I don't know if those really are cobblestones, but that certainly is Annette Dawn.

Annette Dawn

Annette Dawn

Annette Dawn has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties

Zuzana Drabinova Can Pull of Orange, and She Does

Zuzana Drabinova

Zuzana Drabinova can make the color orange work for her, and she can certainly get out of an orange outfit without too much fuss.

Zuzana Drabinova

Zuzana Drabinova

Zuzana Drabinova

Zuzana Drabinova

Zuzana Drabinova has a gallery here...

Posted via web from Safe For Work Hotties